|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 24 September 2003
doi: 10.1242/dev.00760
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

1 Laboratoire de Génétique et Biologie du Développement,
IBDM, CNRS, Université de la méditerranée, Parc
Scientifique de Luminy, Case 907, 13288 Marseille Cedex 9, France
2 Department of Developmental Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford
University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5427, USA
3 Department of Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5427, USA
Author for correspondence (e-mail:
graba{at}lgpd.univ-mrs.fr)
Accepted 29 July 2003
Hox proteins play fundamental roles in generating pattern diversity during development and evolution, acting in broad domains but controlling localized cell diversification and pattern. Much remains to be learned about how Hox selector proteins generate cell-type diversity. In this study, regulatory specificity was investigated by dissecting the genetic and molecular requirements that allow the Hox protein Abdominal A to activate wingless in only a few cells of its broad expression domain in the Drosophila visceral mesoderm. We show that the Dpp/Tgfß signal controls Abdominal A function, and that Hox protein and signal-activated regulators converge on a wingless enhancer. The signal, acting through Mad and Creb, provides spatial information that subdivides the domain of Abdominal A function through direct combinatorial action, conferring specificity and diversity upon Abdominal A activity.
Key words: Hox, Signaling, Drosophila, AbdA, Dpp/Tgfß
Related articles in Development:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Hayashi, C. Xu, and R. W. Carthew Cell-type-specific transcription of prospero is controlled by combinatorial signaling in the Drosophila eye Development, August 15, 2008; 135(16): 2787 - 2796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Walsh and S. B. Carroll Collaboration between Smads and a Hox protein in target gene repression Development, October 15, 2007; 134(20): 3585 - 3592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Bondos, X.-X. Tan, and K. S. Matthews Physical and Genetic Interactions Link Hox Function with Diverse Transcription Factors and Cell Signaling Proteins Mol. Cell. Proteomics, May 1, 2006; 5(5): 824 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Williams, M. E. Williams, J. H. Heaton, T. D. Gelehrter, and J. W. Innis Group 13 HOX proteins interact with the MH2 domain of R-Smads and modulate Smad transcriptional activation functions independent of HOX DNA-binding capability Nucleic Acids Res., August 8, 2005; 33(14): 4475 - 4484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Merabet, J. C.-G. Hombria, N. Hu, J. Pradel, and Y. Graba Hox-controlled reorganisation of intrasegmental patterning cues underlies Drosophila posterior spiracle organogenesis Development, July 1, 2005; 132(13): 3093 - 3102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Hersh and S. B. Carroll Direct regulation of knot gene expression by Ultrabithorax and the evolution of cis-regulatory elements in Drosophila Development, April 1, 2005; 132(7): 1567 - 1577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ebner, C. Cabernard, M. Affolter, and S. Merabet Recognition of distinct target sites by a unique Labial/Extradenticle/Homothorax complex Development, April 1, 2005; 132(7): 1591 - 1600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||