QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 15 October 2003
doi: 10.1242/dev.00835

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dev.00835v1 130/24/5915    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Copf, T. Articles by Averof, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Copf, T. Articles by Averof, M.

Posterior patterning genes and the identification of a unique body region in the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana

¹ Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (IMBB-FORTH), Vassilika Vouton, 71110 Iraklio Crete, Greece
² Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement, Université Paris 7, 7 quai St Bernard, 75005 Paris, France
³ Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: averof{at}imbb.forth.gr)

Accepted 28 August 2003

All arthropods share the same basic set of Hox genes, although the expression of these genes differs among divergent groups. In the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana, their expression is limited to the head, thoracic/trunk and genital segments, but is excluded from more posterior parts of the body which consist of six post-genital segments and the telson (bearing the anus). Nothing is currently known about the genes that specify the identity of these posterior structures. We examine the expression patterns of four candidate genes, Abdominal-B, caudal/Cdx, even-skipped/Evx and spalt, the homologues of which are known to play an important role in the specification of posterior structures in other animals. Abdominal-B is expressed in the genital segments of Artemia, but not in the post-genital segments at any developmental stage. The expression of caudal, even-skipped and spalt in the larval growth-zone suggests they may play a role in the generation of body segments (perhaps comparable with the role of gap and segmentation genes in insects), but not a direct role in defining the identity of post-genital segments. The expression of caudal at later stages suggests a role in the specification of anal structures. A PCR screen designed to isolate Hox genes expressed specifically in the posterior part of the body failed to identify any new Hox genes. We conclude that the post-genital segments of Artemia are not defined by any of the genes known to play a role in the specification of posterior segments in other arthropods. We argue that these segments constitute a unique body region that bears no obvious homology to previously characterised domains of Hox gene activity.

Key words: Hox genes, Crustaceans, Body plans, Evolution

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Shinmyo, T. Mito, T. Uda, T. Nakamura, K. Miyawaki, H. Ohuchi, and S. Noji brachyenteron is necessary for morphogenesis of the posterior gut but not for anteroposterior axial elongation from the posterior growth zone in the intermediate-germband cricket Gryllus bimaculatus Development, November 15, 2006; 133(22): 4539 - 4547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. C. Olesnicky, A. E. Brent, L. Tonnes, M. Walker, M. A. Pultz, D. Leaf, and C. Desplan A caudal mRNA gradient controls posterior development in the wasp Nasonia Development, October 15, 2006; 133(20): 3973 - 3982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Copf, R. Schroder, and M. Averof From the Cover: Ancestral role of caudal genes in axis elongation and segmentation PNAS, December 21, 2004; 101(51): 17711 - 17715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]