|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 15 September 2004
doi: 10.1242/dev.01323
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK, Gurdon Institute of Cancer and Developmental Biology and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jim{at}gurdon.cam.ac.uk)
Accepted 23 June 2004
Mesoderm formation in the amphibian embryo occurs through an inductive interaction in which cells of the vegetal hemisphere of the embryo act on overlying equatorial cells. The first candidate mesoderm-inducing factor to be identified was activin, a member of the transforming growth factor type ß family, and it is now clear that members of this family are indeed involved in mesoderm and endoderm formation. In particular, Derrière and five nodal-related genes are all considered to be strong candidates for endogenous mesoderm-inducing agents. Here, we show that activin, the function of which in mesoderm induction has hitherto been unclear, also plays a role in mesoderm formation. Inhibition of activin function using antisense morpholino oligonucleotides interferes with mesoderm formation in a concentration-dependent manner and also changes the expression levels of other inducing agents such as Xnr2 and Derrière. This work reinstates activin as a key player in mesodermal patterning. It also emphasises the importance of checking for polymorphisms in the 5' untranslated region of the gene of interest when carrying out antisense morpholino experiments in Xenopus laevis.
Key words: Xenopus, Mesoderm induction, TGFß family, Activin
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. S. Eisen and J. C. Smith Controlling morpholino experiments: don't stop making antisense Development, May 15, 2008; 135(10): 1735 - 1743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Kelber, G. Shani, E. C. Booker, W. W. Vale, and P. C. Gray Cripto Is a Noncompetitive Activin Antagonist That Forms Analogous Signaling Complexes with Activin and Nodal J. Biol. Chem., February 22, 2008; 283(8): 4490 - 4500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Saka, A. I. Hagemann, O. Piepenburg, and J. C. Smith Nuclear accumulation of Smad complexes occurs only after the midblastula transition in Xenopus Development, December 1, 2007; 134(23): 4209 - 4218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Yun, S.-C. Choi, E. Park, S.-J. Kim, A.-S. Chung, H.-K. Lee, H.-J. Lee, and J.-K. Han Negative regulation of Activin/Nodal signaling by SRF during Xenopus gastrulation Development, February 15, 2007; 134(4): 769 - 777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Heasman Patterning the early Xenopus embryo. Development, April 1, 2006; 133(7): 1205 - 1217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jullien and J. Gurdon Morphogen gradient interpretation by a regulated trafficking step during ligand-receptor transduction Genes & Dev., November 15, 2005; 19(22): 2682 - 2694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Collart, K. Verschueren, A. Rana, J. C. Smith, and D. Huylebroeck The novel Smad-interacting protein Smicl regulates Chordin expression in the Xenopus embryo Development, October 15, 2005; 132(20): 4575 - 4586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||