|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online September 30, 2004
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.01391
Department of Cell Biology, BOX 3709, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
Author for correspondence (e-mail:
h.lin{at}cellbio.duke.edu)
Accepted 14 July 2004
A fundamental yet unexplored question in stem cell biology is how the fate of tissue stem cells is initially determined during development. In Drosophila, germline stem cells (GSCs) descend from a subset of primordial germ cells (PGCs) at the onset of oogenesis. GSC determination may occur at the onset of oogenesis when a subset of PGCs is induced to become GSCs by contacting niche cells. Alternatively, the GSC fate could be predetermined for a subset of PGCs before oogenesis, due to either their interaction with specific somatic cells in the embryonic/larval gonads, or their inherently heterogeneous potential in becoming GSCs, or both. Here, we show that anterior somatic cells in the embryonic gonad already differ from posterior somatic cells and are likely to be the precursors of niche cells in the adult ovary. Furthermore, only pole cells in the anterior half of the embryonic gonad give rise to the PGCs that frequently acquire contact with nascent niche cells in the late larval ovary. Eventually, only these contacting PGCs become GSCs, whereas non-contacting PGCs directly differentiate into cystoblasts. The strong preference of these `anterior PGCs' towards contacting niche cells does not require DE-cadherin-mediated adhesion and is not correlated with either orientation or rate of their divisions. These data suggest that the GSC fate is predetermined before oogenesis. The predetermination probably involves soma/pole-cell interaction in the anterior half of the embryonic gonad, followed by an active homing mechanism during PGC proliferation to maintain the contact between the `anterior PGCs' and anterior somatic cells.
Key words: Stem cell, Germline, Primordial germ cell, Somatic signalling, Drosophila
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y. Hayashi, S. Kobayashi, and H. Nakato Drosophila glypicans regulate the germline stem cell niche J. Cell Biol., November 16, 2009; 187(4): 473 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Dansereau and P. Lasko RanBPM regulates cell shape, arrangement, and capacity of the female germline stem cell niche in Drosophila melanogaster J. Cell Biol., September 8, 2008; 182(5): 963 - 977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Yang, D. Chen, R. Duan, L. Xia, J. Wang, A. Qurashi, P. Jin, and D. Chen Argonaute 1 regulates the fate of germline stem cells in Drosophila Development, December 1, 2007; 134(23): 4265 - 4272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Y. Kadyrova, Y. Habara, T. H. Lee, and R. P. Wharton Translational control of maternal Cyclin B mRNA by Nanos in the Drosophila germline Development, April 15, 2007; 134(8): 1519 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Shigenobu, Y. Kitadate, C. Noda, and S. Kobayashi Molecular characterization of embryonic gonads by gene expression profiling in Drosophila melanogaster PNAS, September 12, 2006; 103(37): 13728 - 13733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Casper and M. Van Doren The control of sexual identity in the Drosophila germline Development, August 1, 2006; 133(15): 2783 - 2791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Yoshida, M. Sukeno, T. Nakagawa, K. Ohbo, G. Nagamatsu, T. Suda, and Y.-i. Nabeshima The first round of mouse spermatogenesis is a distinctive program that lacks the self-renewing spermatogonia stage Development, April 15, 2006; 133(8): 1495 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
