|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 17 November 2004
doi: 10.1242/dev.01534
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stowers Institute for Medical Research, 1000 East 50th Street, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: pmk{at}stowers-institute.org)
Accepted 8 October 2004
The proper assembly of craniofacial structures and the peripheral nervous system requires neural crest cells to emerge from the neural tube and navigate over long distances to the branchial arches. Cell and molecular studies have shed light on potential intrinsic and extrinsic cues, which, in combination, are thought to ensure the induction and specification of cranial neural crest cells. However, much less is known about how migrating neural crest cells interpret and integrate signals from the microenvironment and other neural crest cells to sort into and maintain the stereotypical pattern of three spatially segregated streams. Here, we explore the extent to which cranial neural crest cells use cell-to-cell and cell-environment interactions to pathfind. The cell membrane and cytoskeletal elements in chick premigratory neural crest cells were labeled in vivo. Three-dimensional reconstructions of migrating neural crest cells were then obtained using confocal static and time-lapse imaging. It was found that neural crest cells maintained nearly constant contact with other migrating neural crest cells, in addition to the microenvironment. Cells used lamellipodia or short, thin filopodia (1-2 µm wide) for local contacts (<20 µm). Non-local, long distance contact (up to 100 µm) was initiated by filopodia that extended and retracted, extended and tracked, or tethered two non-neighboring cells. Intriguingly, the cell-to-cell contacts often stimulated a cell to change direction in favor of a neighboring cell's trajectory. In summary, our results present in vivo evidence for local and long-range neural crest cell interactions, suggesting a possible role for these contacts in directional guidance.
Key words: Chick, Neural crest, Cranial, Filopodia, Cell guidance, Confocal, Time-lapse imaging
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in Development:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  I. Shnitsar and A. Borchers PTK7 recruits dsh to regulate neural crest migration Development, December 15, 2008; 135(24): 4015 - 4024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. K. Matthews, L. Marchant, C. Carmona-Fontaine, S. Kuriyama, J. Larrain, M. R. Holt, M. Parsons, and R. Mayor Directional migration of neural crest cells in vivo is regulated by Syndecan-4/Rac1 and non-canonical Wnt signaling/RhoA Development, May 15, 2008; 135(10): 1771 - 1780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Kuriyama and R. Mayor Molecular analysis of neural crest migration Phil Trans R Soc B, April 12, 2008; 363(1495): 1349 - 1362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
X. Xu, R. Francis, C. J. Wei, K. L. Linask, and C. W. Lo Connexin 43-mediated modulation of polarized cell movement and the directional migration of cardiac neural crest cells Development, September 15, 2006; 133(18): 3629 - 3639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. M. Kulesa, J. C. Kasemeier-Kulesa, J. M. Teddy, N. V. Margaryan, E. A. Seftor, R. E. B. Seftor, and M. J. C. Hendrix Reprogramming metastatic melanoma cells to assume a neural crest cell-like phenotype in an embryonic microenvironment PNAS, March 7, 2006; 103(10): 3752 - 3757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. C. Kasemeier-Kulesa, P. M. Kulesa, and F. Lefcort Imaging neural crest cell dynamics during formation of dorsal root ganglia and sympathetic ganglia Development, January 15, 2005; 132(2): 235 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
