|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online April 22, 2004
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.01076
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Committee on Developmental Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago IL 60637,
USA
2 Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago,
Chicago IL 60637, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: elfergus{at}midway.uchicago.edu)
Accepted 14 January 2004
The available experimental data support the hypothesis that the cap cells (CpCs) at the anterior tip of the germarium form an environmental niche for germline stem cells (GSCs) of the Drosophila ovary. Each GSC undergoes an asymmetric self-renewal division that gives rise to both a GSC, which remains associated with the CpCs, and a more posterior located cystoblast (CB). The CB upregulates expression of the novel gene, bag of marbles (bam), which is necessary for germline differentiation. Decapentaplegic (Dpp), a BMP2/4 homologue, has been postulated to act as a highly localized niche signal that maintains a GSC fate solely by repressing bam transcription. Here, we further examine the role of Dpp in GSC maintenance. In contrast to the above model, we find that an enhancer trap inserted near the Dpp target gene, Daughters against Dpp (Dad), is expressed in additional somatic cells within the germarium, suggesting that Dpp protein may be distributed throughout the anterior germarium. However, Dad-lacZ expression within the germline is present only in GSCs and to a lower level in CBs, suggesting there are mechanisms that actively restrict Dpp signaling in germ cells. We demonstrate that one function of Bam is to block Dpp signaling downstream of Dpp receptor activation, thus establishing the existence of a negative feedback loop between the action of the two genes. Moreover, in females doubly mutant for bam and the ubiquitin protein ligase Smurf, the number of germ cells responsive to Dpp is greatly increased relative to the number observed in either single mutant. These data indicate that there are multiple, genetically redundant mechanisms that act within the germline to downregulate Dpp signaling in the Cb and its descendants, and raise the possibility that a Cb and its descendants must become refractory to Dpp signaling in order for germline differentiation to occur.
Key words: Decapentaplegic, Dpp, Stem cell, GSC, Bam, Smurf, Drosophila, Germline
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Z. Guo and Z. Wang The glypican Dally is required in the niche for the maintenance of germline stem cells and short-range BMP signaling in the Drosophila ovary Development, November 1, 2009; 136(21): 3627 - 3635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Li, N. T. Minor, J. K. Park, D. M. McKearin, and J. Z. Maines Bam and Bgcn antagonize Nanos-dependent germ-line stem cell maintenance PNAS, June 9, 2009; 106(23): 9304 - 9309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Chau, L. S. Kulnane, and H. K. Salz Sex-lethal Facilitates the Transition From Germline Stem Cell to Committed Daughter Cell in the Drosophila Ovary Genetics, May 1, 2009; 182(1): 121 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Rhiner, B. Diaz, M. Portela, J. F. Poyatos, I. Fernandez-Ruiz, J. M. Lopez-Gay, O. Gerlitz, and E. Moreno Persistent competition among stem cells and their daughters in the Drosophila ovary germline niche Development, March 15, 2009; 136(6): 995 - 1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Wang, Z. Li, and Y. Cai The JAK/STAT pathway positively regulates DPP signaling in the Drosophila germline stem cell niche J. Cell Biol., February 25, 2008; 180(4): 721 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Lopez-Onieva, A. Fernandez-Minan, and A. Gonzalez-Reyes Jak/Stat signalling in niche support cells regulates dpp transcription to control germline stem cell maintenance in the Drosophila ovary Development, February 1, 2008; 135(3): 533 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. T. Fuller and A. C. Spradling Male and Female Drosophila Germline Stem Cells: Two Versions of Immortality Science, April 20, 2007; 316(5823): 402 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Z. Maines, J. K. Park, M. Williams, and D. M. McKearin Stonewalling Drosophila stem cell differentiation by epigenetic controls Development, April 15, 2007; 134(8): 1471 - 1479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
X. Song, G. B. Call, D. Kirilly, and T. Xie Notch signaling controls germline stem cell niche formation in the Drosophila ovary Development, March 15, 2007; 134(6): 1071 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Buszczak, S. Paterno, D. Lighthouse, J. Bachman, J. Planck, S. Owen, A. D. Skora, T. G. Nystul, B. Ohlstein, A. Allen, et al. The Carnegie Protein Trap Library: A Versatile Tool for Drosophila Developmental Studies Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1505 - 1531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Niki, T. Yamaguchi, and A. P. Mahowald Establishment of stable cell lines of Drosophila germ-line stem cells PNAS, October 31, 2006; 103(44): 16325 - 16330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Muzzopappa and P. Wappner Multiple roles of the F-box protein Slimb in Drosophila egg chamber development Development, June 1, 2005; 132(11): 2561 - 2571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. M. Yamashita, M. T. Fuller, and D. L. Jones Signaling in stem cell niches: lessons from the Drosophila germline J. Cell Sci., February 15, 2005; 118(4): 665 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Gilboa and R. Lehmann How different is Venus from Mars? The genetics of germ-line stem cells in Drosophila females and males Development, October 15, 2004; 131(20): 4895 - 4905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
