QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 23 June 2005
doi: 10.1242/dev.01920

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material All Versions of this Article: dev.01920v1 132/15/3333    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Castro, B. Articles by Posakony, J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Castro, B. Articles by Posakony, J. W.

Lateral inhibition in proneural clusters: cis-regulatory logic and default repression by Suppressor of Hairless

Brian Castro, Scott Barolo^*, Adina M. Bailey and James W. Posakony

Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0349, USA

Author for correspondence (e-mail: jposakony{at}ucsd.edu)

Accepted 25 May 2005

Lateral inhibition, wherein a single cell signals to its neighbors to prevent them from adopting its own fate, is the best-known setting for cell-cell communication via the Notch (N) pathway. During peripheral neurogenesis in Drosophila, sensory organ precursor (SOP) cells arise within proneural clusters (PNCs), small groups of cells endowed with SOP fate potential by their expression of proneural transcriptional activators. SOPs use N signaling to activate in neighboring PNC cells the expression of multiple genes that inhibit the SOP fate. These genes respond transcriptionally to direct regulation by both the proneural proteins and the N pathway transcription factor Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)], and their activation is generally highly asymmetric; i.e. only in the inhibited (non-SOP) cells of the PNC, and not in SOPs. We show that the substantially higher proneural protein levels in the SOP put this cell at risk of inappropriately activating the SOP-inhibitory genes, even without input from N-activated Su(H). We demonstrate that this is prevented by direct `default' repression of these genes by Su(H), acting through the same binding sites it uses for activation in non-SOPs. We show that de-repression of even a single N pathway target gene in the SOP can extinguish the SOP cell fate. Finally, we define crucial roles for the adaptor protein Hairless and the co-repressors Groucho and CtBP in conferring repressive activity on Su(H) in the SOP. Our work elucidates the regulatory logic by which N signaling and the proneural proteins cooperate to create the neural precursor/epidermal cell fate distinction during lateral inhibition.

Key words: Cell-cell signaling, Default repression, Co-repressors, Neural precursor specification, Cell fate, Cis-regulatory logic, Drosophila

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. del Alamo and M. Mlodzik Self-modulation of Notch signaling during ommatidial development via the Roughened eye transcriptional repressor Development, September 1, 2008; 135(17): 2895 - 2904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U.-M. Fiuza and A. M. Arias Cell and molecular biology of Notch J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2007; 194(3): 459 - 474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Krejci and S. Bray Notch activation stimulates transient and selective binding of Su(H)/CSL to target enhancers Genes & Dev., June 1, 2007; 21(11): 1322 - 1327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Hwang, A. D. Meruelo, and P. W. Sternberg C. elegans EVI1 proto-oncogene, EGL-43, is necessary for Notch-mediated cell fate specification and regulates cell invasion Development, February 15, 2007; 134(4): 669 - 679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]