QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 23 June 2005
doi: 10.1242/dev.01908

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dev.01908v1 132/15/3371    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hehr, C. L. Articles by McFarlane, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hehr, C. L. Articles by McFarlane, S.

Matrix metalloproteinases are required for retinal ganglion cell axon guidance at select decision points

University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: smcfarla{at}ucalgary.ca)

Accepted 18 May 2005

Axons receive guidance information from extrinsic cues in their environment in order to reach their targets. In the frog Xenopus laevis, retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons make three key guidance decisions en route through the brain. First, they cross to the contralateral side of the brain at the optic chiasm. Second, they turn caudally in the mid-diencephalon. Finally, they must recognize the optic tectum as their target. The matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM) families are zinc (Zn)-dependent proteolytic enzymes. The latter functions in axon guidance, but a similar role has not yet been identified for the MMP family. Our previous work implicated metalloproteinases in the guidance decisions made by Xenopus RGC axons. To test specifically the importance of MMPs, we used two different in vivo exposed brain preparations in which RGC axons were exposed to an MMP-specific pharmacological inhibitor (SB-3CT), either as they reached the optic chiasm or as they extended through the diencephalon en route to the optic tectum. Interestingly, SB-3CT affected only two of the guidance decisions, with misrouting defects at the optic chiasm and tectum. Only at higher concentrations was RGC axon extension also impaired. These data implicate MMPs in the guidance of vertebrate axons, and suggest that different metalloproteinases function to regulate axon behaviour at distinct choice points: an MMP is important in guidance at the optic chiasm and the target, while either a different MMP or an ADAM is required for axons to make the turn in the mid-diencephalon.

Key words: Xenopus laevis, MMP2, MMP9, Growth cone, Target recognition, Optic chiasm

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. M. Miller, A. Page-McCaw, and H. T. Broihier Matrix metalloproteinases promote motor axon fasciculation in the Drosophila embryo Development, January 1, 2008; 135(1): 95 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Chen, C. L. Hehr, K. Atkinson-Leadbeater, J. C. Hocking, and S. McFarlane Targeting of Retinal Axons Requires the Metalloproteinase ADAM10 J. Neurosci., August 1, 2007; 27(31): 8448 - 8456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B Gonthier, C Nasarre, L Roth, M Perraut, N Thomasset, G Roussel, D Aunis, and D Bagnard Functional Interaction between Matrix Metalloproteinase-3 and Semaphorin-3C during Cortical Axonal Growth and Guidance Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2007; 17(7): 1712 - 1721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Meyer and H. Aberle At the next stop sign turn right: the metalloprotease Tolloid-related 1 controls defasciculation of motor axons in Drosophila Development, October 15, 2006; 133(20): 4035 - 4044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]