|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online August 2, 2005
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.01939
1 Department of Biology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225,
USA
2 Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
¶ Author for correspondence (e-mail: pultz{at}biol.wwu.edu)
Accepted 13 June 2005
Developmental genetic analysis has shown that embryos of the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis depend more on zygotic gene products to direct axial patterning than do Drosophila embryos. In Drosophila, anterior axial patterning is largely established by bicoid, a rapidly evolving maternal-effect gene, working with hunchback, which is expressed both maternally and zygotically. Here, we focus on a comparative analysis of Nasonia hunchback function and expression. We find that a lesion in Nasonia hunchback is responsible for the severe zygotic headless mutant phenotype, in which most head structures and the thorax are deleted, as are the three most posterior abdominal segments. This defines a major role for zygotic Nasonia hunchback in anterior patterning, more extensive than the functions described for hunchback in Drosophila or Tribolium. Despite the major zygotic role of Nasonia hunchback, we find that it is strongly expressed maternally, as well as zygotically. Nasonia Hunchback embryonic expression appears to be generally conserved; however, the mRNA expression differs from that of Drosophila hunchback in the early blastoderm. We also find that the maternal hunchback message decays at an earlier developmental stage in Nasonia than in Drosophila, which could reduce the relative influence of maternal products in Nasonia embryos. Finally, we extend the comparisons of Nasonia and Drosophila hunchback mutant phenotypes, and propose that the more severe Nasonia hunchback mutant phenotype may be a consequence of differences in functionally overlapping regulatory circuitry.
Key words: Nasonia, Hunchback, Axis formation, Evolution of development, Hymenoptera, Drosophila
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Lemke and U. Schmidt-Ott Evidence for a composite anterior determinant in the hover fly Episyrphus balteatus (Syrphidae), a cyclorrhaphan fly with an anterodorsal serosa anlage Development, January 1, 2009; 136(1): 117 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. V Saenko, V. French, P. M Brakefield, and P. Beldade Conserved developmental processes and the formation of evolutionary novelties: examples from butterfly wings Phil Trans R Soc B, April 27, 2008; 363(1496): 1549 - 1556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Marques-Souza, M. Aranda, and D. Tautz Delimiting the conserved features of hunchback function for the trunk organization of insects Development, March 1, 2008; 135(5): 881 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Papatsenko and M. S. Levine Dual regulation by the Hunchback gradient in the Drosophila embryo PNAS, February 26, 2008; 105(8): 2901 - 2906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. E. Brent, G. Yucel, S. Small, and C. Desplan Permissive and Instructive Anterior Patterning Rely on mRNA Localization in the Wasp Embryo Science, March 30, 2007; 315(5820): 1841 - 1843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. K. Dearden, M. J. Wilson, L. Sablan, P. W. Osborne, M. Havler, E. McNaughton, K. Kimura, N. V. Milshina, M. Hasselmann, T. Gempe, et al. Patterns of conservation and change in honey bee developmental genes Genome Res., November 1, 2006; 16(11): 1376 - 1384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. C. Olesnicky, A. E. Brent, L. Tonnes, M. Walker, M. A. Pultz, D. Leaf, and C. Desplan A caudal mRNA gradient controls posterior development in the wasp Nasonia Development, October 15, 2006; 133(20): 3973 - 3982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
