|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online March 4, 2005
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.01693
Department of Development and Differentiation, Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
Author for correspondence (e-mail:
tesaito{at}frontier.kyoto-u.ac.jp)
Accepted 5 January 2005
The mammalian cerebral cortex comprises six layers of neurons. Cortical progenitors in the ventricular zone generate neurons specific to each layer through successive cell divisions. Neurons of layer VI are generated at an early stage, whereas later-born neurons occupy progressively upper layers. The underlying molecular mechanisms of neurogenesis, however, are relatively unknown. In this study, we devised a system where the Notch pathway was activated spatiotemporally in the cortex by in vivo electroporation and Cre-mediated DNA recombination. Electroporation at E13.5 transferred DNA to early progenitors that gave rise to neurons of both low and upper layers. Forced expression of a constitutively active form of Notch (caNotch) at E13.5 inhibited progenitors from generating neurons and kept progenitors as proliferating radial glial cells. After subsequent transfection at E15.5 of a Cre expression vector to remove caNotch, double-transfected cells, in which caNotch was excised, migrated into the cortical plate and differentiated into neurons specific to upper layers. Bromodeoxyuridine-labeling experiments showed that the neurons were born after Cre transfection. These results indicate that cortical progenitors that had been temporarily subjected to Notch activation at an early stage generated neurons at later stages, but that the generation of low-layer neurons was skipped. Moreover, the double-transfected cells gave rise to upper-layer neurons, even after their transplantation into the E13.5 brain, indicating that the developmental state of progenitors is not halted by caNotch activity.
Key words: Notch, Electroporation, Neurogenesis, Cerebral cortex, Asymmetric division
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. J. Breunig, J. Silbereis, F. M. Vaccarino, N. Sestan, and P. Rakic Notch regulates cell fate and dendrite morphology of newborn neurons in the postnatal dentate gyrus PNAS, December 18, 2007; 104(51): 20558 - 20563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Bartkowska, A. Paquin, A. S. Gauthier, D. R. Kaplan, and F. D. Miller Trk signaling regulates neural precursor cell proliferation and differentiation during cortical development Development, December 15, 2007; 134(24): 4369 - 4380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. P. Jadhav, S.-H. Cho, and C. L. Cepko Notch activity permits retinal cells to progress through multiple progenitor states and acquire a stem cell property PNAS, December 12, 2006; 103(50): 18998 - 19003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 X. Zhu, J. Zhang, J. Tollkuhn, R. Ohsawa, E. H. Bresnick, F. Guillemot, R. Kageyama, and M. G. Rosenfeld Sustained Notch signaling in progenitors is required for sequential emergence of distinct cell lineages during organogenesis Genes & Dev., October 1, 2006; 20(19): 2739 - 2753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Paquin, F. Barnabe-Heider, R. Kageyama, and F. D. Miller CCAAT/Enhancer-Binding Protein Phosphorylation Biases Cortical Precursors to Generate Neurons Rather Than Astrocytes In Vivo J. Neurosci., November 16, 2005; 25(46): 10747 - 10758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. A. Mason, S. M. Rakowiecki, M. Raftopoulou, S. Nery, Y. Huang, T. Gridley, and G. Fishell Notch signaling coordinates the patterning of striatal compartments Development, October 1, 2005; 132(19): 4247 - 4258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
