|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 14 June 2006
doi: 10.1242/dev.02429
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biozentrum, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: frank.hirth{at}unibas.ch)
Accepted 5 May 2006
Brain development in Drosophila is characterized by two neurogenic periods, one during embryogenesis and a second during larval life. Although much is known about embryonic neurogenesis, little is known about the genetic control of postembryonic brain development. Here we use mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) to study the role of the brain tumor (brat) gene in neural proliferation control and tumour suppression in postembryonic brain development of Drosophila. Our findings indicate that overproliferation in brat mutants is due to loss of proliferation control in the larval central brain and not in the optic lobe. Clonal analysis indicates that the brat mutation affects cell proliferation in a cell-autonomous manner and cell cycle marker expression shows that cells of brat mutant clones show uncontrolled proliferation, which persists into adulthood. Analysis of the expression of molecular markers, which characterize cell types in wild-type neural lineages, indicates that brat mutant clones comprise an excessive number of cells, which have molecular features of undifferentiated progenitor cells that lack nuclear Prospero (Pros). pros mutant clones phenocopy brat mutant clones in the larval central brain, and targeted expression of wild-type pros in brat mutant clones promotes cell cycle exit and differentiation of brat mutant cells, thereby abrogating brain tumour formation. Taken together, our results provide evidence that the tumour suppressor brat negatively regulates cell proliferation during larval central brain development of Drosophila, and suggest that Prospero acts as a key downstream effector of brat in cell fate specification and proliferation control.
Key words: Drosophila, Brain tumor, Prospero, Stem cell, Progenitor cell, Proliferation, Tumour
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Wang, K. C. Chang, G. Somers, D. Virshup, B. T. Ang, C. Tang, F. Yu, and H. Wang Protein phosphatase 2A regulates self-renewal of Drosophila neural stem cells Development, July 1, 2009; 136(13): 2287 - 2296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Sousa-Nunes, W. Chia, and W. G. Somers Protein Phosphatase 4 mediates localization of the Miranda complex during Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions Genes & Dev., February 1, 2009; 23(3): 359 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T.D. Southall, B. Egger, K.S. Gold, and A.H. Brand Regulation of Self-renewal and Differentiation in the Drosophila Nervous System Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 15, 2009; (2009) sqb.2008.73.051v1. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Tsuji, E. Hasegawa, and T. Isshiki Neuroblast entry into quiescence is regulated intrinsically by the combined action of spatial Hox proteins and temporal identity factors Development, December 1, 2008; 135(23): 3859 - 3869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Lichtneckert, L. Nobs, and H. Reichert empty spiracles is required for the development of olfactory projection neuron circuitry in Drosophila Development, July 15, 2008; 135(14): 2415 - 2424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Q. Doe Neural stem cells: balancing self-renewal with differentiation Development, May 1, 2008; 135(9): 1575 - 1587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. E. Kaplow, A. H. Korayem, and T. R. Venkatesh Regulation of Glia Number in Drosophila by Rap/Fzr, an Activator of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex, and Loco, an RGS Protein Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2003 - 2016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Casso, S. Liu, D. D. Iwaki, S. K. Ogden, and T. B. Kornberg A Screen for Modifiers of Hedgehog Signaling in Drosophila melanogaster Identifies swm and mts Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1399 - 1413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Chia, W. G. Somers, and H. Wang Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions: cell cycle regulators, asymmetric protein localization, and tumorigenesis J. Cell Biol., January 28, 2008; 180(2): 267 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Egger, J. M Chell, and A. H Brand Insights into neural stem cell biology from flies Phil Trans R Soc B, January 12, 2008; 363(1489): 39 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Xie, M. Charlton-Perkins, E. McDonald, B. Gebelein, and T. Cook Senseless functions as a molecular switch for color photoreceptor differentiation in Drosophila Development, December 1, 2007; 134(23): 4243 - 4253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Bello, N. Holbro, and H. Reichert Polycomb group genes are required for neural stem cell survival in postembryonic neurogenesis of Drosophila Development, March 15, 2007; 134(6): 1091 - 1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Wang, G. W. Somers, A. Bashirullah, U. Heberlein, F. Yu, and W. Chia Aurora-A acts as a tumor suppressor and regulates self-renewal of Drosophila neuroblasts Genes & Dev., December 15, 2006; 20(24): 3453 - 3463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.-Y. Lee, R. O. Andersen, C. Cabernard, L. Manning, K. D. Tran, M. J. Lanskey, A. Bashirullah, and C. Q. Doe Drosophila Aurora-A kinase inhibits neuroblast self-renewal by regulating aPKC/Numb cortical polarity and spindle orientation Genes & Dev., December 15, 2006; 20(24): 3464 - 3474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
