spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 14 June 2006
doi: 10.1242/dev.02435


Development 133, 2661-2669 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dev.02435v1
133/14/2661    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crump, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kimmel, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crump, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kimmel, C. B.

Moz-dependent Hox expression controls segment-specific fate maps of skeletal precursors in the face

Justin Gage Crump*, Mary E. Swartz, Johann K. Eberhart and Charles B. Kimmel

Institute of Neuroscience, 1254 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: gage{at}uoneuro.uoregon.edu)

Accepted 9 May 2006

Development of the facial skeleton depends on interactions between intrinsic factors in the skeletal precursors and extrinsic signals in the facial environment. Hox genes have been proposed to act cell-intrinsically in skeletogenic cranial neural crest cells (CNC) for skeletal pattern. However, Hox genes are also expressed in other facial tissues, such as the ectoderm and endoderm, suggesting that Hox genes could also regulate extrinsic signalling from non-CNC tissues. Here we study moz mutant zebrafish in which hoxa2b and hoxb2a expression is lost and the support skeleton of the second pharyngeal segment is transformed into a duplicate of the first-segment-derived jaw skeleton. By performing tissue mosaic experiments between moz- and wild-type embryos, we show that Moz and Hox genes function in CNC, but not in the ectoderm or endoderm, to specify the support skeleton. How then does Hox expression within CNC specify a support skeleton at the cellular level? Our fate map analysis of skeletal precursors reveals that Moz specifies a second-segment fate map in part by regulating the interaction of CNC with the first endodermal pouch (p1). Removal of p1, either by laser ablation or in the itga5b926 mutant, reveals that p1 epithelium is required for development of the wild-type support but not the moz- duplicate jaw-like skeleton. We present a model in which Moz-dependent Hox expression in CNC shapes the normal support skeleton by instructing second-segment CNC to undergo skeletogenesis in response to local extrinsic signals.

Key words: Craniofacial, Skeleton, Zebrafish, Moz, Hox, Morphogenesis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
C. B. Kimmel and J. K. Eberhart
The midline, oral ectoderm, and the arch-0 problem
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 2, 2008; (2008) icn048v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
K. Laue, S. Daujat, J. G. Crump, N. Plaster, H. H. Roehl, Tubingen 2000 Screen Consortium, C. B. Kimmel, R. Schneider, and M. Hammerschmidt
The multidomain protein Brpf1 binds histones and is required for Hox gene expression and segmental identity
Development, June 1, 2008; 135(11): 1935 - 1946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006