|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online August 14, 2006
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.02529




1 Developmental Genetics, DKBW Centre for Biomedicine, University of Basel
Medical School, Mattenstrasse 28, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland.
2 Department of Developmental Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH
Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Joint senior authors for correspondence (e-mail:
aimee.zuniga{at}unibas.ch;
rolf.zeller{at}unibas.ch)
Accepted 5 July 2006
Spatially and temporally coordinated changes in gene expression are crucial to orderly progression of embryogenesis. We combine mouse genetics with experimental manipulation of signalling to analyze the kinetics by which the SHH morphogen and the BMP antagonist gremlin 1 (GREM1) control gene expression in the digit-forming mesenchyme of mouse limb buds. Although most mesenchymal cells respond rapidly to SHH signalling, the transcriptional upregulation of specific SHH target signals in the mesenchyme occurs with differential temporal kinetics and in a spatially restricted fashion. In particular, the expression of the BMP antagonist Grem1 is always upregulated in mesenchymal cells located distal to the SHH source and acts upstream of FGF signalling by the apical ectodermal ridge. GREM1/FGF-mediated feedback signalling is, in turn, required to propagate SHH and establish the presumptive digit expression domains of the Notch ligand jagged 1 (Jag1) and 5'Hoxd genes in the distal limb bud mesenchyme. Their establishment is significantly delayed in Grem1-deficient limb buds and cannot be rescued by specific restoration of SHH signalling in mutant limb buds. This shows that GREM1/FGF feedback signalling is required for regulation of the temporal kinetics of the mesenchymal response to SHH signalling. Finally, inhibition of SHH signal transduction at distinct time points reveals the differential temporal dependence of Grem1, Jag1 and 5'Hoxd gene expression on SHH signalling. In particular, the expression of Hoxd13 depends on SHH signal transduction significantly longer than does Hoxd11 expression, revealing that the reverse co-linear establishment, but not maintenance of their presumptive digit expression domains, depends on SHH signalling.
Key words: BMP antagonist, Cyclopamine, Feedback signalling, FGF, Gremlin1, Hox gene expression, Limb development, Sonic hedgehog, SU5402
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Liu, A. C. Barbosa, S. L. Chapman, S. Bezprozvannaya, X. Qi, J. A. Richardson, H. Yanagisawa, and E. N. Olson DNA binding-dependent and -independent functions of the Hand2 transcription factor during mouse embryogenesis Development, March 15, 2009; 136(6): 933 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-D. Benazet, M. Bischofberger, E. Tiecke, A. Goncalves, J. F. Martin, A. Zuniga, F. Naef, and R. Zeller A Self-Regulatory System of Interlinked Signaling Feedback Loops Controls Mouse Limb Patterning Science, February 20, 2009; 323(5917): 1050 - 1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kawakami, Y. Uchiyama, C. Rodriguez Esteban, T. Inenaga, N. Koyano-Nakagawa, H. Kawakami, M. Marti, M. Kmita, P. Monaghan-Nichols, R. Nishinakamura, et al. Sall genes regulate region-specific morphogenesis in the mouse limb by modulating Hox activities Development, February 15, 2009; 136(4): 585 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Robertson, I. Charatsi, C. J. Joyner, C. H. Koonce, M. Morgan, A. Islam, C. Paterson, E. Lejsek, S. J. Arnold, A. Kallies, et al. Blimp1 regulates development of the posterior forelimb, caudal pharyngeal arches, heart and sensory vibrissae in mice Development, December 15, 2007; 134(24): 4335 - 4345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Michos, A. Goncalves, J. Lopez-Rios, E. Tiecke, F. Naillat, K. Beier, A. Galli, S. Vainio, and R. Zeller Reduction of BMP4 activity by gremlin 1 enables ureteric bud outgrowth and GDNF/WNT11 feedback signalling during kidney branching morphogenesis Development, July 1, 2007; 134(13): 2397 - 2405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||