|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 4 October 2006
doi: 10.1242/dev.02612
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, The Babraham Institute,
Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK.
2 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular Biology,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Author for correspondence (e-mail:
wolf.reik{at}bbsrc.ac.uk)
Accepted 5 September 2006
The mouse Kcnq1 imprinted domain is located on distal chromosome 7 and contains several imprinted genes that are paternally repressed. Repression of these genes is regulated by a non-coding antisense transcript, Kcnq1ot1, which is paternally expressed. Maternal repression of Kcnq1ot1 is controlled by DNA methylation originating in the oocyte. Some genes in the region are imprinted only in the placenta, whereas others are imprinted in both extra-embryonic and embryonic lineages. Here, we show that Kcnq1ot1 is paternally expressed in preimplantation embryos from the two-cell stage, and that ubiquitously imprinted genes proximal to Kcnq1ot1 are already repressed in blastocysts, ES cells and TS cells. Repressive histone marks such as H3K27me3 are present on the paternal allele of these genes in both ES and TS cells. Placentally imprinted genes that are distal to Kcnq1ot1, by contrast, are not imprinted in blastocysts, ES or TS cells. In these genes, paternal silencing and differential histone marks arise during differentiation of the trophoblast lineage between E4.5 and E7.5. Our findings show that the dynamics during preimplantation development of gene inactivation and acquisition of repressive histone marks in ubiquitously imprinted genes of the Kcnq1 domain are very similar to those of imprinted X inactivation. By contrast, genes that are only imprinted in the placenta, while regulated by the same non-coding RNA transcript Kcnq1ot1, undergo epigenetic inactivation during differentiation of the trophoblast lineage. Our findings establish a model for how epigenetic gene silencing by non-coding RNA may depend on distance from the non-coding RNA and on lineage and differentiation specific factors.
Key words: Epigenetics, Imprinting, ES and TS cells, Kcnq1 domain, Mouse
Related articles in Development:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Wagschal, H. G. Sutherland, K. Woodfine, A. Henckel, K. Chebli, R. Schulz, R. J. Oakey, W. A. Bickmore, and R. Feil G9a Histone Methyltransferase Contributes to Imprinting in the Mouse Placenta Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2008; 28(3): 1104 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. I. Verona, J. L. Thorvaldsen, K. J. Reese, and M. S. Bartolomei The Transcriptional Status but Not the Imprinting Control Region Determines Allele-Specific Histone Modifications at the Imprinted H19 Locus Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2008; 28(1): 71 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Schaefer, M. Meusburger, and F. Lyko Non-mammalian models for epigenetic analyses in cancer Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2007; 16(R1): R1 - R6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. V. Fitzpatrick, E. M. Pugacheva, J.-Y. Shin, Z. Abdullaev, Y. Yang, K. Khatod, V. V. Lobanenkov, and M. J. Higgins Allele-Specific Binding of CTCF to the Multipartite Imprinting Control Region KvDMR1 Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2007; 27(7): 2636 - 2647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
