spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 18 October 2006
doi: 10.1242/dev.02625


Development 133, 4595-4606 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dev.02625v1
133/22/4595    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Risebro, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Riley, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Risebro, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Riley, P. R.

Hand1 regulates cardiomyocyte proliferation versus differentiation in the developing heart

Catherine A. Risebro1, Nicola Smart1, Laurent Dupays2, Ross Breckenridge2, Timothy J. Mohun2 and Paul R. Riley1,*

1 Molecular Medicine Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
2 Developmental Biology Division, National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK.

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: p.riley{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk)

Accepted 12 September 2006

The precise origins of myocardial progenitors and their subsequent contribution to the developing heart has been an area of considerable activity within the field of cardiovascular biology. How these progenitors are regulated and what signals are responsible for their development are, however, much less well understood. Clearly, not only is there a need to identify factors that regulate the transition from proliferation of cardioblasts to differentiation of cardiac muscle, but it is also necessary to identify factors that maintain an adequate pool of undifferentiated myocyte precursors as a prerequisite to preventing organ hypoplasia and congenital heart disease. Here, we report how upregulation of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor Hand1, restricted exclusively to Hand1-expressing cells, brings about a significant extension of the heart tube and extraneous looping caused by the elevated proliferation of cardioblasts in the distal outflow tract. This activity is independent of the further recruitment of extracardiac cells from the secondary heart field and permissive for the continued differentiation of adjacent myocardium. Culture studies using embryonic stem (ES) cell-derived cardiomyocytes revealed that, in a Hand1-null background, there is significantly elevated cardiomyocyte differentiation, with an apparent default mesoderm pathway to a cardiomyocyte fate. However, Hand1 gain of function maintains proliferating precursors resulting in delayed and significantly reduced cardiomyocyte differentiation that is mediated by the prevention of cell-cycle exit, by G1 progression and by increased cell division. Thus, this work identifies Hand1 as a crucial cardiac regulatory protein that controls the balance between proliferation and differentiation in the developing heart, and fills a significant gap in our understanding of how the myocardium of the embryonic heart is established.

Key words: Heart, Hand1, Mouse, Tet-Off, Outflow tract, Cardiomyocyte, Proliferation, Differentiation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
S. M. Reamon-Buettner, Y. Ciribilli, A. Inga, and J. Borlak
A loss-of-function mutation in the binding domain of HAND1 predicts hypoplasia of the human hearts
Hum. Mol. Genet., May 15, 2008; 17(10): 1397 - 1405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006