QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 15 November 2006
doi: 10.1242/dev.02669

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material All Versions of this Article: dev.02669v1 133/24/4881    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhang, T. Articles by Pignoni, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhang, T. Articles by Pignoni, F. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Direct control of neurogenesis by selector factors in the fly eye: regulation of atonal by Ey and So

Ophthalmology Department, Harvard Medical School/MEEI, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: francesca_pignoni{at}meei.harvard.edu)

Accepted 3 October 2006

During eye development, the selector factors of the Eyeless/Pax6 or Retinal Determination (RD) network control specification of organ-type whereas the bHLH-type proneural factor Atonal drives neurogenesis. Although significant progress has been made in dissecting the acquisition of `eye identity' at the transcriptional level, the molecular mechanisms underlying the progression from neuronal progenitor to differentiating neuron remain unclear. A recently proposed model for the integration of organ specification and neurogenesis hypothesizes that atonal expression in the eye is RD-network-independent and that Eyeless works in parallel or downstream of atonal to modify the neurogenetic program. We show here that distinct cis-regulatory elements control atonal expression specifically in the eye and that the RD factors Eyeless and Sine oculis function as direct regulators. We find that these transcription factors interact in vitro and provide indirect evidence that this interaction may be required in vivo. The subordination of neurogenesis to the RD pathway in the eye provides a direct mechanism for the coordination of neurogenesis and tissue specification during sensory organ formation.

Key words: Sensory organ, Specification, Neurogenesis, Photoreceptor Development, Eye morphogenesis, Drosophila, Atonal, Eyeless, Pax6

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Bao and M. Friedrich Molecular Evolution of the Drosophila Retinome: Exceptional Gene Gain in the Higher Diptera Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2009; 26(6): 1273 - 1287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. R. Braid and E. M. Verheyen Drosophila Nemo Promotes Eye Specification Directed by the Retinal Determination Gene Network Genetics, September 1, 2008; 180(1): 283 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Hayashi, C. Xu, and R. W. Carthew Cell-type-specific transcription of prospero is controlled by combinatorial signaling in the Drosophila eye Development, August 15, 2008; 135(16): 2787 - 2796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Schlosser How old genes make a new head: redeployment of Six and Eya genes during the evolution of vertebrate cranial placodes Integr. Comp. Biol., September 1, 2007; 47(3): 343 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]