spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 5 January 2006
doi: 10.1242/dev.02211


Development 133, 529-536 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dev.02211v1
133/3/529    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siegrist, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Doe, C. Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siegrist, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Doe, C. Q.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Extrinsic cues orient the cell division axis in Drosophila embryonic neuroblasts

Sarah E. Siegrist and Chris Q. Doe*

Institutes of Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: cdoe{at}uoneuro.uoregon.edu)

Accepted 14 November 2005

Cell polarity must be integrated with tissue polarity for proper development. The Drosophila embryonic central nervous system (CNS) is a highly polarized tissue; neuroblasts occupy the most apical layer of cells within the CNS, and lie just basal to the neural epithelium. Neuroblasts are the CNS progenitor cells and undergo multiple rounds of asymmetric cell division, `budding off' smaller daughter cells (GMCs) from the side opposite the epithelium, thereby positioning neuronal/glial progeny towards the embryo interior. It is unknown whether this highly stereotypical orientation of neuroblast divisions is controlled by an intrinsic cue (e.g. cortical mark) or an extrinsic cue (e.g. cell-cell signal). Using live imaging and in vitro culture, we find that neuroblasts in contact with epithelial cells always `bud off' GMCs in the same direction, opposite from the epithelia-neuroblast contact site, identical to what is observed in vivo. By contrast, isolated neuroblasts `bud off' GMCs at random positions. Imaging of centrosome/spindle dynamics and cortical polarity shows that in neuroblasts contacting epithelial cells, centrosomes remained anchored and cortical polarity proteins localize at the same epithelia-neuroblast contact site over subsequent cell cycles. In isolated neuroblasts, centrosomes drifted between cell cycles and cortical polarity proteins showed a delay in polarization and random positioning. We conclude that embryonic neuroblasts require an extrinsic signal from the overlying epithelium to anchor the centrosome/centrosome pair at the site of epithelial-neuroblast contact and for proper temporal and spatial localization of cortical Par proteins. This ensures the proper coordination between neuroblast cell polarity and CNS tissue polarity.

Key words: Tissue polarity, Par proteins, Extrinsic, Intrinsic, Cortical polarity, Spindle orientation, Drosophila


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCBHome page
I. Dupin, E. Camand, and S. Etienne-Manneville
Classical cadherins control nucleus and centrosome position and cell polarity
J. Cell Biol., June 1, 2009; 185(5): 779 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. A. Newman and K. E. Prehoda
Intramolecular Interactions Between the Src Homology 3 Guanylate Kinase Domains of Discs Large Regulate Its Function in Asymmetric Cell Division
J. Biol. Chem., May 8, 2009; 284(19): 12924 - 12932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
L. M. Petti, E. C. Ricciardi, H. J. Page, and K. A. Porter
Transforming signals resulting from sustained activation of the PDGF{beta} receptor in mortal human fibroblasts
J. Cell Sci., April 15, 2008; 121(8): 1172 - 1182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
Y. M. Yamashita and M. T. Fuller
Asymmetric centrosome behavior and the mechanisms of stem cell division
J. Cell Biol., January 28, 2008; 180(2): 261 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
B. Egger, J. M Chell, and A. H Brand
Insights into neural stem cell biology from flies
Phil Trans R Soc B, January 12, 2008; 363(1489): 39 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
S. X. Atwood, C. Chabu, R. R. Penkert, C. Q. Doe, and K. E. Prehoda
Cdc42 acts downstream of Bazooka to regulate neuroblast polarity through Par-6 aPKC
J. Cell Sci., September 15, 2007; 120(18): 3200 - 3206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
L. N. Nejsum and W. J. Nelson
A molecular mechanism directly linking E-cadherin adhesion to initiation of epithelial cell surface polarity
J. Cell Biol., July 10, 2007; 178(2): 323 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
V. Picco, C. Hudson, and H. Yasuo
Ephrin-Eph signalling drives the asymmetric division of notochord/neural precursors in Ciona embryos
Development, April 15, 2007; 134(8): 1491 - 1497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
B. Strauss, R. J. Adams, and N. Papalopulu
A default mechanism of spindle orientation based on cell shape is sufficient to generate cell fate diversity in polarised Xenopus blastomeres
Development, October 1, 2006; 133(19): 3883 - 3893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006