QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 22 February 2006
doi: 10.1242/dev.02300

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material All Versions of this Article: dev.02300v1 133/7/1263    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dixon, S. J. Articles by Roy, P. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dixon, S. J. Articles by Roy, P. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

FGF negatively regulates muscle membrane extension in Caenorhabditis elegans

Department of Medical Genetics and Microbiology, Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A, Canada.

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: peter.roy{at}utoronto.ca)

Accepted 26 January 2006

Striated muscles from Drosophila and several vertebrates extend plasma membrane to facilitate the formation of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) during development. However, the regulation of these membrane extensions is poorly understood. In C. elegans, the body wall muscles (BWMs) also have plasma membrane extensions called muscle arms that are guided to the motor axons where they form the postsynaptic element of the NMJ. To investigate the regulation of muscle membrane extension, we screened 871 genes by RNAi for ectopic muscle membrane extensions (EMEs) in C. elegans. We discovered that an FGF pathway, including let-756(FGF), egl-15(FGF receptor), sem-5(GRB2) and other genes negatively regulates plasma membrane extension from muscles. Although compromised FGF pathway activity results in EMEs, hyperactivity of the pathway disrupts larval muscle arm extension, a phenotype we call muscle arm extension defective or MAD. We show that expression of egl-15 and sem-5 in the BWMs are each necessary and sufficient to prevent EMEs. Furthermore, we demonstrate that let-756 expression from any one of several tissues can rescue the EMEs of let-756 mutants, suggesting that LET-756 does not guide muscle membrane extensions. Our screen also revealed that loss-of-function in laminin and integrin components results in both MADs and EMEs, the latter of which are suppressed by hyperactive FGF signaling. Our data are consistent with a model in which integrins and laminins are needed for directed muscle arm extension to the nerve cords, while FGF signaling provides a general mechanism to regulate muscle membrane extension.

Key words: Muscle arms, Muscle development, Elegans, FGF, RNAi, Integrin

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Alexander, K. K. M. Chan, A. B. Byrne, G. Selman, T. Lee, J. Ono, E. Wong, R. Puckrin, S. J. Dixon, and P. J. Roy An UNC-40 pathway directs postsynaptic membrane extension in Caenorhabditis elegans Development, March 15, 2009; 136(6): 911 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Schmidt, N. Marcus-Gueret, A. Adeleye, J. Webber, D. Baillie, and E. G. Stringham The cell migration molecule UNC-53/NAV2 is linked to the ARP2/3 complex by ABI-1 Development, February 15, 2009; 136(4): 563 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]