QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 6 June 2007
doi: 10.1242/dev.001065

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dev.001065v1 134/14/2549    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Duboule, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Duboule, D.

The rise and fall of Hox gene clusters

National Research Centre `Frontiers in Genetics', Department of Zoology and Animal Biology, University of Geneva, Sciences III, Switzerland. School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale, Lausanne, Switzerland.

e-mails: Denis.Duboule{at}zoo.unige.ch; Denis.Duboule{at}epfl.ch

SUMMARY

Although all bilaterian animals have a related set of Hox genes, the genomic organization of this gene complement comes in different flavors. In some unrelated species, Hox genes are clustered; in others, they are not. This indicates that the bilaterian ancestor had a clustered Hox gene family and that, subsequently, this genomic organization was either maintained or lost. Remarkably, the tightest organization is found in vertebrates, raising the embarrassingly finalistic possibility that vertebrates have maintained best this ancestral configuration. Alternatively, could they have co-evolved with an increased `organization' of the Hox clusters, possibly linked to their genomic amplification, which would be at odds with our current perception of evolutionary mechanisms? When discussing the why's and how's of Hox gene clustering, we need to account for three points: the mechanisms of cluster evolution; the underlying biological constraints; and the developmental modes of the animals under consideration. By integrating these parameters, general conclusions emerge that can help solve the aforementioned dilemma.

"See my son, here time becomes space"

Gurnemanz, in Parsifal (R. Wagner)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. L. Garaulet, D. Foronda, M. Calleja, and E. Sanchez-Herrero Polycomb-dependent Ultrabithorax Hox gene silencing induced by high Ultrabithorax levels in Drosophila Development, October 1, 2008; 135(19): 3219 - 3228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mungpakdee, H.-C. Seo, A. R. Angotzi, X. Dong, A. Akalin, and D. Chourrout Differential Evolution of the 13 Atlantic Salmon Hox Clusters Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2008; 25(7): 1333 - 1343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Deschamps Tailored Hox gene transcription and the making of the thumb Genes & Dev., February 1, 2008; 22(3): 293 - 296. [Full Text] [PDF]