|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 13 December 2006
doi: 10.1242/dev.02726
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


1 Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of
Cambridge, Anatomy Building, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK.
2 Institute of Biotechnology, College of Bioresources and Agriculture, National
Taiwan University, Taipei, 106, Taiwan.
3 LBME-CNRS, UMR 5099, IFR, Toulouse, France.
Author for correspondence (e-mail:
afsmith{at}mole.bio.cam.ac.uk)
Accepted 2 November 2006
Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism controlling parental-origin-specific gene expression. Perturbing the parental origin of the distal portion of mouse chromosome 12 causes alterations in the dosage of imprinted genes resulting in embryonic lethality and developmental abnormalities of both embryo and placenta. A 1 Mb imprinted domain identified on distal chromosome 12 contains three paternally expressed protein-coding genes and multiple non-coding RNA genes, including snoRNAs and microRNAs, expressed from the maternally inherited chromosome. An intergenic, parental-origin-specific differentially methylated region, the IG-DMR, which is unmethylated on the maternally inherited chromosome, is necessary for the repression of the paternally expressed protein-coding genes and for activation of the maternally expressed non-coding RNAs: its absence causes the maternal chromosome to behave like the paternally inherited one. Here, we characterise the developmental consequences of this epigenotype switch and compare these with phenotypes associated with paternal uniparental disomy of mouse chromosome 12. The results show that the embryonic defects described for uniparental disomy embryos can be attributed to this one cluster of imprinted genes on distal chromosome 12 and that these defects alone, and not the mutant placenta, can cause prenatal lethality. In the placenta, the absence of the IG-DMR has no phenotypic consequence. Loss of repression of the protein-coding genes occurs but the non-coding RNAs are not repressed on the maternally inherited chromosome. This indicates that the mechanism of action of the IG-DMR is different in the embryo and the placenta and suggests that the epigenetic control of imprinting differs in these two lineages.
Key words: Genomic imprinting, Dlk1-Dio3 domain, Mouse development
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Braem, B. Recolin, R. C. Rancourt, C. Angiolini, P. Barthes, P. Branchu, F. Court, G. Cathala, A. C. Ferguson-Smith, and T. Forne Genomic Matrix Attachment Region and Chromosome Conformation Capture Quantitative Real Time PCR Assays Identify Novel Putative Regulatory Elements at the Imprinted Dlk1/Gtl2 Locus J. Biol. Chem., July 4, 2008; 283(27): 18612 - 18620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zhang, S. Volinia, T. Bonome, G. A. Calin, J. Greshock, N. Yang, C.-G. Liu, A. Giannakakis, P. Alexiou, K. Hasegawa, et al. Genomic and epigenetic alterations deregulate microRNA expression in human epithelial ovarian cancer PNAS, May 13, 2008; 105(19): 7004 - 7009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||