spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 31 October 2007
doi: 10.1242/dev.003798

Development 134, 4219-4231 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dev.003798v1
134/23/4219    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dietrich, J.-E.
Right arrow Articles by Hiiragi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dietrich, J.-E.
Right arrow Articles by Hiiragi, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo

Jens-Erik Dietrich* and Takashi Hiiragi*,{dagger}

Max-Planck Institute of Immunobiology, Department of Developmental Biology, Freiburg i. Br., Germany.

{dagger} Author for correspondence (e-mail: hiiragi{at}mpi-muenster.mpg.de)

Accepted 31 August 2007

Mouse pre-implantation development gives rise to the blastocyst, which is made up of at least three distinct cell types: the trophectoderm (TE) that surrounds a cavity, and an inner cell mass (ICM) comprising the primitive endoderm (PE) and epiblast (EPI). However, the underlying mechanisms involved in patterning the cleavage-stage embryo are still unresolved. By analyzing the distribution of the transcription factors Oct4 (Pou5f1), Cdx2 and Nanog at precisely defined stages in pre-implantation development, we were able to identify critical events leading to the divergence of TE, EPI and PE lineages. We found that Oct4 is present in all cells until late blastocyst, gradually disappearing from the TE thereafter. The expression patterns of both Cdx2 and Nanog exhibit two specific phases, culminating in their restriction to TE and EPI, respectively. In the first phase, starting after compaction, blastomeres show highly variable Cdx2 and Nanog protein levels. Importantly, the variability in Nanog levels is independent of position within the morula, whereas Cdx2 variability may originate from asymmetric cell divisions at the 8-cell stage in a non-stereotypic way. Furthermore, there is initially no reciprocal relationship between Cdx2 and Oct4 or between Cdx2 and Nanog protein levels. In the second phase, a definite pattern is established, possibly by a sorting process that accommodates intrinsic and extrinsic cues. Based on these results, we propose a model in which early embryonic mouse patterning includes stochastic processes, consistent with the highly regulative capacity of the embryo. This may represent a feature unique to early mammalian development.

Key words: Embryonic patterning, Lineage specification, Mouse pre-implantation embryos


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in Development:

Pre-implantation patterning by chance?

Development 2007 134: e2302. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
J. Rossant and P. P. L. Tam
Blastocyst lineage formation, early embryonic asymmetries and axis patterning in the mouse
Development, March 1, 2009; 136(5): 701 - 713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
K. Hochedlinger and K. Plath
Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency
Development, February 15, 2009; 136(4): 509 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Reproductive SciencesHome page
T. Fujimori, Y. Kurotaki, K. Komatsu, and Y.-i. Nabeshima
Morphological Organization of the Mouse Preimplantation Embryo
Reproductive Sciences, February 1, 2009; 16(2): 171 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Genes Dev.Home page
A. Jedrusik, D.-E. Parfitt, G. Guo, M. Skamagki, J. B. Grabarek, M. H. Johnson, P. Robson, and M. Zernicka-Goetz
Role of Cdx2 and cell polarity in cell allocation and specification of trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the mouse embryo
Genes & Dev., October 1, 2008; 22(19): 2692 - 2706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
B. Plusa, A. Piliszek, S. Frankenberg, J. Artus, and A.-K. Hadjantonakis
Distinct sequential cell behaviours direct primitive endoderm formation in the mouse blastocyst
Development, September 15, 2008; 135(18): 3081 - 3091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
H. Honda, N. Motosugi, T. Nagai, M. Tanemura, and T. Hiiragi
Computer simulation of emerging asymmetry in the mouse blastocyst
Development, April 15, 2008; 135(8): 1407 - 1414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
M. Bischoff, D.-E. Parfitt, and M. Zernicka-Goetz
Formation of the embryonic-abembryonic axis of the mouse blastocyst: relationships between orientation of early cleavage divisions and pattern of symmetric/asymmetric divisions
Development, March 1, 2008; 135(5): 953 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Cell Sci.Home page
J.-E. Dietrich and T. Hiiragi
Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo
J. Cell Sci., December 1, 2007; 120(23): e1 - e1.
[Full Text]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007