spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 23, 2008
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.015826


Development 135, 2183-2192 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yao, L.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Warrior, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yao, L.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Warrior, R.

Multiple modular promoter elements drive graded brinker expression in response to the Dpp morphogen gradient

Li-Chin Yao1, Sopheap Phin1, Jane Cho1, Christine Rushlow2, Kavita Arora1,* and Rahul Warrior1,*

1 Department of Developmental and Cell Biology and the Developmental Biology Center, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92612, USA.
2 Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.

* Authors for correspondence (e-mails: karora{at}uci.edu; rwarrior{at}uci.edu)

Accepted 22 April 2008

Morphogen gradients play fundamental roles in patterning and cell specification during development by eliciting differential transcriptional responses in target cells. In Drosophila, Decapentaplegic (Dpp), the BMP2/4 homolog, downregulates transcription of the nuclear repressor brinker (brk) in a concentration-dependent manner to generate an inverse graded distribution. Both Dpp and Brk are crucial for directing Dpp target gene expression in defined domains and the consequent execution of distinct developmental programs. Thus, determining the mechanism by which the brk promoter interprets the Dpp activity gradient is essential for understanding both Dpp-dependent patterning and how graded signaling activity can generate different responses through transcriptional repression. We have uncovered key features of the brk promoter that suggest it uses a complex enhancer logic not represented in current models. First, we find that the regulatory region contains multiple compact modules that can independently drive brk-like expression patterns. Second, each module contains binding sites for the Schnurri/Mad/Medea (SMM) complex, which mediates Dpp-dependent repression, linked to regions that direct activation. Third, the SMM repression complex acts through a distance-dependent mechanism that probably uses the canonical co-repressor C-terminal Binding Protein (CtBP). Finally, our data suggest that inputs from multiple regulatory modules are integrated to generate the final pattern. This unusual promoter organization may be necessary for brk to respond to the Dpp gradient in a precise and robust fashion.

Key words: Morphogen, Developmental patterning, Transcriptional regulation, decapentaplegic, brinker, Drosophila


Related articles in Development:

Dpp on the brink(er)

Development 2008 135: e1205. [Full Text]  






© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008