QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 25 June 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.022145

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dev.022145v1 135/15/2505    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sweeney, D. Articles by Davies, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sweeney, D. Articles by Davies, J. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Developmental plasticity and regenerative capacity in the renal ureteric bud/collecting duct system

Derina Sweeney^*, Nils Lindström^* and Jamie A. Davies

Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Hugh Robson Building, George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, UK.

Author for correspondence (e-mail: jamie.davies{at}ed.ac.uk)

Accepted 6 June 2008

SUMMARY

Branching morphogenesis of epithelia is an important mechanism in animal development, being responsible for the characteristic architectures of glandular organs such as kidney, lung, prostate and salivary gland. In these systems, new branches usually arise at the tips of existing branches. Recent studies, particularly in kidney, have shown that tip cells express a set of genes distinct from those in the stalks. Tip cells also undergo most cell proliferation, daughter cells either remaining in the tip or being left behind as the tips advance, to differentiate and contribute to new stalk. Published time-lapse observations have suggested, though, that new branches may be able to arise from stalks. This happens so rarely, however, that it is not clear whether this reflects true plasticity and reversal of differentiation, or whether it is just an occasional instance of groups of tip cells being `left behind' by error in a mainly stalk zone. To determine whether cells that have differentiated into stalks really do retain the ability to make new tips, we have removed existing tips from stalks, verified that the stalks are free of tip cells, and assessed the ability of tip-free stalks to initiate new branches. We find stalks to be fully capable of regenerating tips that express typical tip markers, with these tips going on to form epithelial trees, at high frequency. The transition from tip to stalk is therefore reversible, at least for early stages of development. This observation has major implications for models of pattern formation in branching trees, and may also be important for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Key words: Kidney, Regeneration, Stem cell, Ureteric bud, Branching

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. M. Shah, J. B. Tee, T. Meyer, C. Meyer-Schwesinger, Y. Choi, D. E. Sweeney, T. F. Gallegos, K. Johkura, E. Rosines, V. Kouznetsova, et al. The instructive role of metanephric mesenchyme in ureteric bud patterning, sculpting, and maturation and its potential ability to buffer ureteric bud branching defects Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2009; 297(5): F1330 - F1341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]