QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 24 July 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.023788

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material All Versions of this Article: dev.023788v1 135/17/2845    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in Development Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leucht, P. Articles by Helms, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Leucht, P. Articles by Helms, J. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Embryonic origin and Hox status determine progenitor cell fate during adult bone regeneration

Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jhelms{at}stanford.edu)

Accepted 30 June 2008

The fetal skeleton arises from neural crest and from mesoderm. Here, we provide evidence that each lineage contributes a unique stem cell population to the regeneration of injured adult bones. Using Wnt1Cre::Z/EG mice we found that the neural crest-derived mandible heals with neural crest-derived skeletal stem cells, whereas the mesoderm-derived tibia heals with mesoderm-derived stem cells. We tested whether skeletal stem cells from each lineage were functionally interchangeable by grafting mesoderm-derived cells into mandibular defects, and vice versa. All of the grafting scenarios, except one, healed through the direct differentiation of skeletal stem cells into osteoblasts; when mesoderm-derived cells were transplanted into tibial defects they differentiated into osteoblasts but when transplanted into mandibular defects they differentiated into chondrocytes. A mismatch between the Hox gene expression status of the host and donor cells might be responsible for this aberration in bone repair. We found that initially, mandibular skeletal progenitor cells are Hox-negative but that they adopt a Hoxa11-positive profile when transplanted into a tibial defect. Conversely, tibial skeletal progenitor cells are Hox-positive and maintain this Hox status even when transplanted into a Hox-negative mandibular defect. Skeletal progenitor cells from the two lineages also show differences in osteogenic potential and proliferation, which translate into more robust in vivo bone regeneration by neural crest-derived cells. Thus, embryonic origin and Hox gene expression status distinguish neural crest-derived from mesoderm-derived skeletal progenitor cells, and both characteristics influence the process of adult bone regeneration.

Key words: Neural crest, Mesoderm, Periosteum, Osteoblast, Chondrocyte, Graft, Mouse

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in Development:

Bone regeneration: a tale of two progenitors

Development 2008 135: e1704. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I.-H. Chung, T. Yamaza, H. Zhao, P.-H. Choung, S. Shi, and Y. Chai Stem Cell Property of Postmigratory Cranial Neural Crest Cells and Their Utility in Alveolar Bone Regeneration and Tooth Development Stem Cells, April 1, 2009; 27(4): 866 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]