|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online September 5, 2008
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.018697
Hypothesis |

1 Laboratory for Development and Evolution, University Museum of Zoology,
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
2 School of Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK.
3 School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD,
UK.
Author for correspondence (e-mail:
jj231{at}cam.ac.uk)
SUMMARY
Positional specification by morphogen gradients is traditionally viewed as a two-step process. A gradient is formed and then interpreted, providing a spatial metric independent of the target tissue, similar to the concept of space in classical mechanics. However, the formation and interpretation of gradients are coupled, dynamic processes. We introduce a conceptual framework for positional specification in which cellular activity feeds back on positional information encoded by gradients, analogous to the feedback between mass-energy distribution and the geometry of space-time in Einstein's general theory of relativity. We discuss how such general relativistic positional information (GRPI) can guide systems-level approaches to pattern formation.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. T. Reeves and A. Stathopoulos Graded Dorsal and Differential Gene Regulation in the Drosophila Embryo Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, October 1, 2009; 1(4): a000836 - a000836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Ribes and J. Briscoe Establishing and Interpreting Graded Sonic Hedgehog Signaling during Vertebrate Neural Tube Patterning: The Role of Negative Feedback Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, August 1, 2009; 1(2): a002014 - a002014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||