spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 12 December 2007
doi: 10.1242/dev.009662

Development 135, 291-300 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dev.009662v1
135/2/291    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coiffier, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kerridge, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coiffier, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kerridge, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Common functions of central and posterior Hox genes for the repression of head in the trunk of Drosophila

Delphine Coiffier, Bernard Charroux and Stephen Kerridge*

Institut de Biologie du Développement de Marseille Luminy, UMR6216 CNRS Université de la Méditerranée, Case 907 Parc Scientifique de Luminy, 13288 Marseille Cedex 09, France.

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: kerridge{at}ibdml.univ-mrs.fr)

Accepted 30 October 2007

Hox genes are localised in complexes, encode conserved homeodomain transcription factors and have mostly been studied for their specialised functions: the formation of distinct structures along the anteroposterior axis. They probably derived via duplication followed by divergence, from a unique gene, suggesting that Hox genes may have retained a common function. The comparison of their homeodomain sequences groups Hox proteins into Anterior, Central and Posterior classes, reflecting their expression patterns in the head, trunk and tail, respectively. However, functional data supporting this classification are rare. Here, we re-examine a common activity of Hox genes in Drosophila: the repression of head in the trunk. First, we show that central and posterior Hox genes prevent the expression of the head specific gene optix in the trunk, providing a functional basis for the classification. Loss-of-function mutations of optix affect embryonic head development, whereas ectopic Optix expression strongly perturbs trunk development. Second, we demonstrate that the non-Hox genes teashirt, extradenticle and homothorax are required for the repression of optix and that Wingless signalling and Engrailed contribute to this repression. We propose that an evolutionary early function of Hox genes was to modify primitive head morphology with novel functions specialising the trunk appearing later on.

Key words: Drosophila, Hox, optix/Six3, Head, Trunk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in Development:

Heads down with Hox

Development 2008 135: e203. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
A. Hijazi, W. Masson, B. Auge, L. Waltzer, M. Haenlin, and F. Roch
boudin is required for septate junction organisation in Drosophila and codes for a diffusible protein of the Ly6 superfamily
Development, July 1, 2009; 136(13): 2199 - 2209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008