spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online November 7, 2008
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.026229


Development 135, 3903-3910 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hong, C.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Saint-Jeannet, J.-P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hong, C.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Saint-Jeannet, J.-P.

Fgf8a induces neural crest indirectly through the activation of Wnt8 in the paraxial mesoderm

Chang-Soo Hong1,2, Byung-Yong Park2 and Jean-Pierre Saint-Jeannet2,*

1 Department of Biological Science, College of Natural Sciences, Daegu University, Jillyang, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 712-714, South Korea.
2 Department of Animal Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3800 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: saintj{at}vet.upenn.edu)

Accepted 2 October 2008

Two independent signals are necessary for neural crest (NC) induction in Xenopus: a Bmp signal, which must be partially attenuated by Bmp antagonists, and a separate signal mediated by either a canonical Wnt or an Fgf. The mesoderm underlying the NC-forming region has been proposed as a source of this second signal. Wnt8 and Fgf8a are expressed in this tissue around the time of NC induction and are therefore good candidate NC inducers. Loss-of-function studies indicate that both of these ligands are necessary to specify the NC; however, it is unclear whether these signaling molecules are operating in the same or in parallel pathways to generate the NC. Here, we describe experiments addressing this outstanding question. We show that although Wnt8 expression can restore NC progenitors in Fgf8a-deficient embryos, Fgf8a is unable to rescue NC formation in Wnt8-depleted embryos. Moreover, the NC-inducing activity of Fgf8a in neuralized explants is strongly repressed by co-injection of a Wnt8 or a β-catenin morpholino, suggesting that the activity of these two signaling molecules is linked. Consistent with these observations, Fgf8a is a potent inducer of Wnt8 in both whole embryos and animal explants, and Fgf8a knockdown results in a dramatic loss of Wnt8 expression in the mesoderm. We propose that Fgf8a induces NC indirectly through the activation of Wnt8 in the paraxial mesoderm, which in turn promotes NC formation in the overlying ectoderm primed by Bmp antagonists.

Key words: Fgf8, Wnt8, Bmp, Neural crest, Induction, Xenopus


Related articles in Development:

How FGF Wnts the neural crest over

Development 2008 135: e2303. [Full Text]  






© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008