|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 16 January 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.015339
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Departments of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville,
TN, USA.
2 Departments of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical
Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
3 Departments of Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center,
Nashville, TN, USA.
4 Departments of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville,
TN, USA.
5 Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Center for
Clinical Sciences Research 3100, 269 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305,
USA.
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: h.wang{at}vanderbilt.edu)
Accepted 5 December 2007
The activation of the blastocyst, a process by which it gains competency to attach with the receptive uterus, is a prerequisite for successful implantation. However, the molecular basis of blastocyst activation remains largely unexplored. Combining molecular, pharmacological and physiological approaches, we show here that silencing of Wnt-β-catenin signaling in mice does not adversely affect the development of preimplantation embryos to blastocysts and uterine preparation for receptivity, but, remarkably, blocks blastocyst competency to implantation. Using the physiologically relevant delayed implantation model and trophoblast stem cells in culture, we further demonstrate that a coordinated activation of canonical Wnt-β-catenin signaling with attenuation of the non-canonical Wnt-RhoA signaling pathway ensures blastocyst competency to implantation. These findings constitute novel evidence that Wnt signaling is at least one pathway that determines blastocyst competency for implantation.
Key words: Blastocyst activation, Implantation, Wnt, β-catenin, Mouse
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Koler, H. Achache, A. Tsafrir, Y. Smith, A. Revel, and R. Reich Disrupted gene pattern in patients with repeated in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure Hum. Reprod., June 19, 2009; (2009) dep193v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Van Vaerenbergh, L. Van Lommel, V. Ghislain, P. In't Veld, F. Schuit, H. M. Fatemi, P. Devroey, and C. Bourgain In GnRH antagonist/rec-FSH stimulated cycles, advanced endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte retrieval correlates with altered gene expression Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1085 - 1091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kondoh, T. Okamoto, T. Higuchi, K. Tatsumi, T. Baba, S. K. Murphy, K. Takakura, I. Konishi, and S. Fujii Stress affects uterine receptivity through an ovarian-independent pathway Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 24(4): 945 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Chen, Y. Zhang, J. Lu, Q. Wang, S. Wang, Y. Cao, H. Wang, and E. Duan Embryo-uterine cross-talk during implantation: the role of Wnt signaling Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 15(4): 215 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. O'Neill Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling in mammalian preimplantation embryo development Reproduction, August 1, 2008; 136(2): 147 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||