spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 23 January 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.015529

Development 135, 849-857 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dev.015529v1
135/5/849    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carrasco-Rando, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ruiz-Gómez, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carrasco-Rando, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ruiz-Gómez, M.

Mind bomb 2, a founder myoblast-specific protein, regulates myoblast fusion and muscle stability

Marta Carrasco-Rando and Mar Ruiz-Gómez*

Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, CSIC and UAM, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049, Madrid, Spain.

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: mruiz{at}cbm.uam.es)

Accepted 17 December 2007

A fundamental step during Drosophila myogenesis is the specification of founder myoblasts (FMs). Founders possess the information required for the acquisition of muscle identity and for the execution of the myogenic programme, whereas fusion-competent myoblasts (FCMs) acquire this information after fusing to founders. Very little is known about genes that implement the execution of the myogenic programme. Here we characterise Mind bomb 2 (Mib2), a protein with putative E3 ubiquitin ligase activity that is exclusive of FMs and necessary for at least two distinct steps of the founder/myotube differentiation programme. Thus, in mib2 mutants, the early process of myoblast fusion is compromised, as FMs undergo a reduced number of rounds of fusion with FCMs. At later stages, with the onset of muscle contraction, many muscles degenerate, display aberrant sarcomeric structure and detach from tendons. The fusion process requires intact E3-RING-finger domains of Mib2 (the putative catalytic sites), probably to eliminate the FCM-specific activator Lmd from nascent myotubes. However, these sites appear dispensable for muscle integrity. This, and the subcellular accumulation of Mib2 in Z and M bands of sarcomeres, plus its physical interaction with nonmuscle myosin (a Z-band-localised protein necessary for the formation of myofibrils), suggest a structural role for Mib2 in maintaining sarcomeric stability. We suggest that Mib2 acts sequentially in myoblast fusion and sarcomeric stability by two separable processes involving distinct functions of Mib2.

Key words: mind bomb 2, Drosophila, Founder myoblasts, Myoblast fusion, Myofibrillogenesis






© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008