|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 6 February 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.016337
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel
Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA.
2 Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA.
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: peifer{at}unc.edu)
Accepted 10 January 2008
Formins are key regulators of actin nucleation and elongation. Diaphanous-related formins, the best-known subclass, are activated by Rho and play essential roles in cytokinesis. In cultured cells, Diaphanous-related formins also regulate cell adhesion, polarity and microtubules, suggesting that they may be key regulators of cell shape change and migration during development. However, their essential roles in cytokinesis hamper our ability to test this hypothesis. We used loss- and gain-of-function approaches to examine the role of Diaphanous in Drosophila morphogenesis. We found that Diaphanous has a dynamic expression pattern consistent with a role in regulating cell shape change. We used constitutively active Diaphanous to examine its roles in morphogenesis and its mechanisms of action. This revealed an unexpected role in regulating myosin levels and activity at adherens junctions during cell shape change, suggesting that Diaphanous helps coordinate adhesion and contractility of the underlying actomyosin ring. We tested this hypothesis by reducing Diaphanous function, revealing striking roles in stabilizing adherens junctions and inhibiting cell protrusiveness. These effects also are mediated through coordinated effects on myosin activity and adhesion, suggesting a common mechanism for Diaphanous action during morphogenesis.
Key words: Myosin, Formins, RhoGEF2, Drosophila
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in Development:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Cavey and T. Lecuit Molecular Bases of Cell-Cell Junctions Stability and Dynamics Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, November 1, 2009; 1(5): a002998 - a002998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Warner and G. D. Longmore Cdc42 antagonizes Rho1 activity at adherens junctions to limit epithelial cell apical tension J. Cell Biol., October 5, 2009; 187(1): 119 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Warner and G. D. Longmore Distinct functions for Rho1 in maintaining adherens junctions and apical tension in remodeling epithelia J. Cell Biol., June 15, 2009; 185(6): 1111 - 1125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gorfinkiel, G. B. Blanchard, R. J. Adams, and A. Martinez Arias Mechanical control of global cell behaviour during dorsal closure in Drosophila Development, June 1, 2009; 136(11): 1889 - 1898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Webb, M.-N. Zhou, and B. M. McCartney A novel role for an APC2-Diaphanous complex in regulating actin organization in Drosophila Development, April 15, 2009; 136(8): 1283 - 1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mulinari, M. P. Barmchi, and U. Hacker DRhoGEF2 and Diaphanous Regulate Contractile Force during Segmental Groove Morphogenesis in the Drosophila Embryo Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2008; 19(5): 1883 - 1892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||