|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 20 February 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.020289
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Report |
1 Departament de Genètica, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona,
Spain.
2 Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, Universidad Pablo de
Olavide-CSIC, 41013 Sevilla, Spain.
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: tadellc{at}ub.edu)
Accepted 4 February 2008
SUMMARY
Little is known about the molecular mechanisms responsible for axis establishment during non-embryonic processes such as regeneration and homeostasis. To address this issue, we set out to analyze the role of the canonical Wnt pathway in planarians, flatworms renowned for their extraordinary morphological plasticity. Canonical Wnt signalling is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism to confer polarity during embryonic development, specifying the anteroposterior (AP) axis in most bilaterians and the dorsoventral (DV) axis in early vertebrate embryos. β-Catenin is a key element in this pathway, although it is a bifunctional protein that is also involved in cell-cell adhesion. Here, we report the characterization of two β-catenin homologs from Schmidtea mediterranea (Smed-βcatenin1/2). Loss of function of Smed-βcatenin1, but not Smed-βcatenin2, in both regenerating and intact planarians, generates radial-like hypercephalized planarians in which the AP axis disappears but the DV axis remains unaffected, representing a unique example of a striking body symmetry transformation. The radial-like hypercephalized phenotype demonstrates the requirement for Smed-βcatenin1 in AP axis re-establishment and maintenance, and supports a conserved role for canonical Wnt signalling in AP axis specification, whereas the role of β-catenin in DV axis establishment would be a vertebrate innovation. When considered alongside the protein domains present in each S. mediterranea β-catenin and the results of functional assays in Xenopus embryos demonstrating nuclear accumulation and axis induction with Smed-βcatenin1, but not Smed-βcatenin2, these data suggest that S. mediterranea β-catenins could be functionally specialized and that only Smed-βcatenin1 is involved in Wnt signalling.
Key words: β-catenin, Planarians, Anteroposterior axis, Regeneration
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. P. Petersen and P. W. Reddien A wound-induced Wnt expression program controls planarian regeneration polarity PNAS, October 6, 2009; 106(40): 17061 - 17066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Meinhardt Models for the Generation and Interpretation of Gradients Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, October 1, 2009; 1(4): a001362 - a001362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Adell, E. Salo, M. Boutros, and K. Bartscherer Smed-Evi/Wntless is required for {beta}-catenin-dependent and -independent processes during planarian regeneration Development, March 15, 2009; 136(6): 905 - 910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Tanaka and B. Galliot Triggering the regeneration and tissue repair programs Development, February 1, 2009; 136(3): 349 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||