|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 20 March 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.014977
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review |
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Institute of Neuroscience, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
e-mail: cdoe{at}uoregon.edu
SUMMARY
Stem cells are captivating because they have the potential to make multiple cell types yet maintain their undifferentiated state. Recent studies of Drosophila and mammalian neural stem cells have shed light on how stem cells regulate self-renewal versus differentiation and have revealed the proteins, processes and pathways that all converge to regulate neural progenitor self-renewal. If we can better understand how stem cells balance self-renewal versus differentiation, we will significantly advance our knowledge of embryogenesis, cancer biology and brain evolution, as well as the use of stem cells for therapeutic purposes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Jacob, C. Maurange, and A. P. Gould Temporal control of neuronal diversity: common regulatory principles in insects and vertebrates? Development, November 1, 2008; 135(21): 3481 - 3489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Fish, C. Dehay, H. Kennedy, and W. B. Huttner Making bigger brains-the evolution of neural-progenitor-cell division J. Cell Sci., September 1, 2008; 121(17): 2783 - 2793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chabu and C. Q. Doe Dap160/intersectin binds and activates aPKC to regulate cell polarity and cell cycle progression Development, August 15, 2008; 135(16): 2739 - 2746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||