spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 13 May 2009
doi: 10.1242/dev.033209


Development 136, 1987-1994 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dev.033209v1
136/12/1987    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arduini, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Henion, P. D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arduini, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Henion, P. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Genetic ablation of neural crest cell diversification

Brigitte L. Arduini1,*,{dagger}, Kevin M. Bosse1,2,* and Paul D. Henion1,2,3,{ddagger}

1 Center for Molecular Neurobiology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
2 Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology Graduate Program, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
3 Department of Neuroscience, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

{ddagger} Author for correspondence (e-mail: henion.1{at}osu.edu)

Accepted 9 April 2009

The neural crest generates multiple cell types during embryogenesis but the mechanisms regulating neural crest cell diversification are incompletely understood. Previous studies using mutant zebrafish indicated that foxd3 and tfap2a function early and differentially in the development of neural crest sublineages. Here, we show that the simultaneous loss of foxd3 and tfap2a function in zebrafish foxd3zdf10;tfap2alow double mutant embryos globally prevents the specification of developmentally distinct neural crest sublineages. By contrast, neural crest induction occurs independently of foxd3 and tfap2a function. We show that the failure of neural crest cell diversification in double mutants is accompanied by the absence of neural crest sox10 and sox9a/b gene expression, and that forced expression of sox10 and sox9a/b differentially rescues neural crest sublineage specification and derivative differentiation. These results demonstrate the functional necessity for foxd3 and tfap2a for neural crest sublineage specification and that this requirement is mediated by the synergistic regulation of the expression of SoxE family genes. Our results identify a genetic regulatory pathway functionally discrete from the process of neural crest induction that is required for the initiation of neural crest cell diversification during embryonic development.

Key words: Neural crest, Cell fate specification, foxd3, tfap2a, SoxE, Zebrafish


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009