spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 15 December 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.027854

Development 136, 263-274 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dev.027854v1
dev.027854v2
136/2/263    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaziova, I.
Right arrow Articles by Bhat, K. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaziova, I.
Right arrow Articles by Bhat, K. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ancestry-independent fate specification and plasticity in the developmental timing of a typical Drosophila neuronal lineage

Ivana Gaziova and Krishna Moorthi Bhat*

Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: kmbhat{at}utmb.edu)

Accepted 13 November 2008

In the Drosophila CNS, combinatorial, interdependent, sequential genetic programs in neuroectodermal (NE) cells, prior to the formation of neuroblasts (NBs), determine the initial identity of NBs. Temporal factors are then sequentially expressed to change the temporal identity. It is unclear at what levels this positional and temporal information integrates to determine progeny cell identity. One idea is that this is a top-down linear process: the identity of a NB determines the identity of its daughter, the ganglion mother cell (GMC), the asymmetric division of the GMC and the fate specification of daughter cells of the GMC. Our results with midline (mid), which encodes a T-box protein, in a typical lineage, NB4-2->GMC-1->RP2/sib, suggest that at least part of the process operates in GMCs. That is, a GMC or a neuronal identity need not be determined at the NB or NE level. This is demonstrated by showing that Mid is expressed in a row 5 GMC (M-GMC), but not in its parent NB or NE cell. In mid mutants, M-GMC changes into GMC-1 and generates an RP2 and a sib without affecting the expression of key genes at the NE/NB levels. Expression of Mid in the M-GMC in mid mutants rescues the fate change, indicating that Mid specifies neurons at the GMC level. Moreover, we found a significant plasticity in the temporal window in which a neuronal lineage can develop. Although the extra GMC-1 in mid mutants is born ~2 hours later than the bona fide GMC-1, it follows the same developmental pattern as the bona fide GMC-1. Thus, a GMC identity can be independent of parental identity and GMC formation and elaboration need not be strictly time-bound.

Key words: Neurogenesis, Drosophila, Midline, Transcription, Ancestry


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Genes Dev.Home page
Q.-X. Liu, M. Hiramoto, H. Ueda, T. Gojobori, Y. Hiromi, and S. Hirose
Midline governs axon pathfinding by coordinating expression of two major guidance systems
Genes & Dev., May 15, 2009; 23(10): 1165 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009