QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 21 January 2009
doi: 10.1242/dev.027904

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material All Versions of this Article: dev.027904v1 136/5/739    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kadam, S. Articles by Stathopoulos, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kadam, S. Articles by Stathopoulos, A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Gene GEO Profiles UniGene Substance via MeSH Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

FGF ligands in Drosophila have distinct activities required to support cell migration and differentiation

California Institute of Technology, Division of Biology MC114-96, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: angelike{at}caltech.edu)

Accepted 30 December 2008

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling controls a vast array of biological processes including cell differentiation and migration, wound healing and malignancy. In vertebrates, FGF signaling is complex, with over 100 predicted FGF ligand-receptor combinations. Drosophila melanogaster presents a simpler model system in which to study FGF signaling, with only three ligands and two FGF receptors (FGFRs) identified. Here we analyze the specificity of FGFR [Heartless (Htl) and Breathless (Btl)] activation by each of the FGF ligands [Pyramus (Pyr), Thisbe (Ths) and Branchless (Bnl)] in Drosophila. We confirm that both Pyr and Ths can activate Htl, and that only Bnl can activate Btl. To examine the role of each ligand in supporting activation of the Htl FGFR, we utilize genetic approaches that focus on the earliest stages of embryonic development. When pyr and ths are equivalently expressed using the Gal4 system, these ligands support qualitatively different FGFR signaling responses. Both Pyr and Ths function in a non-autonomous fashion to support mesoderm spreading during gastrulation, but Pyr exhibits a longer functional range. pyr and ths single mutants exhibit defects in mesoderm spreading during gastrulation, yet only pyr mutants exhibit severe defects in dorsal mesoderm specification. We demonstrate that the Drosophila FGFs have different activities and that cell migration and differentiation have different ligand requirements. Furthermore, these FGF ligands are not regulated solely by differential expression, but the sequences of these linked genes have evolved to serve different functions. We contend that inherent properties of FGF ligands make them suitable to support specific FGF-dependent processes, and that FGF ligands are not always interchangeable.

Key words: Cell migration and differentiation, Drosophila, FGF signaling, Ligand-receptor interactions

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. T. Reeves and A. Stathopoulos Graded Dorsal and Differential Gene Regulation in the Drosophila Embryo Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, October 1, 2009; 1(4): a000836 - a000836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Klingseisen, I. B. N. Clark, T. Gryzik, and H.-A. J. Muller Differential and overlapping functions of two closely related Drosophila FGF8-like growth factors in mesoderm development Development, July 15, 2009; 136(14): 2393 - 2402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]