|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 18 February 2009
doi: 10.1242/dev.030957
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Report |

1 Wellcome Trust Centre for Stem Cell Research, University of Cambridge, Tennis
Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK.
2 Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road,
Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK.
3 Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of
Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK.
Author for correspondence (e-mail:
austin.smith{at}cscr.cam.ac.uk)
Accepted 30 January 2009
SUMMARY
Mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells derived from pluripotent early epiblast contribute functionally differentiated progeny to all foetal lineages of chimaeras. By contrast, epistem cell (EpiSC) lines from post-implantation epithelialised epiblast are unable to colonise the embryo even though they express the core pluripotency genes Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog. We examined interconversion between these two cell types. ES cells can readily become EpiSCs in response to growth factor cues. By contrast, EpiSCs do not change into ES cells. We exploited PiggyBac transposition to introduce a single reprogramming factor, Klf4, into EpiSCs. No effect was apparent in EpiSC culture conditions, but in ground state ES cell conditions a fraction of cells formed undifferentiated colonies. These EpiSC-derived induced pluripotent stem (Epi-iPS) cells activated expression of ES cell-specific transcripts including endogenous Klf4, and downregulated markers of lineage specification. X chromosome silencing in female cells, a feature of the EpiSC state, was erased in Epi-iPS cells. They produced high-contribution chimaeras that yielded germline transmission. These properties were maintained after Cre-mediated deletion of the Klf4 transgene, formally demonstrating complete and stable reprogramming of developmental phenotype. Thus, re-expression of Klf4 in an appropriate environment can regenerate the naïve ground state from EpiSCs. Reprogramming is dependent on suppression of extrinsic growth factor stimuli and proceeds to completion in less than 1% of cells. This substantiates the argument that EpiSCs are developmentally, epigenetically and functionally differentiated from ES cells. However, because a single transgene is the minimum requirement to attain the ground state, EpiSCs offer an attractive opportunity for screening for unknown components of the reprogramming process.
Key words: Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell, Chimaera, Leukaemia inhibitory factor (Lif), Reprogramming, Mitogen-activated protein kinase (Erk) kinase (Mek/Mkk), Embryonic stem (ES) cell
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Hayashi and M. A. Surani Self-renewing epiblast stem cells exhibit continual delineation of germ cells with epigenetic reprogramming in vitro Development, November 1, 2009; 136(21): 3549 - 3556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nichols, J. Silva, M. Roode, and A. Smith Suppression of Erk signalling promotes ground state pluripotency in the mouse embryo Development, October 1, 2009; 136(19): 3215 - 3222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Chambers and S. R. Tomlinson The transcriptional foundation of pluripotency Development, July 15, 2009; 136(14): 2311 - 2322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Guo, J. Yang, J. Nichols, J. S. Hall, I. Eyres, W. Mansfield, and A. Smith Klf4 reverts developmentally programmed restriction of ground state pluripotency J. Cell Sci., April 1, 2009; 122(7): e706 - e706. [Full Text] |
||||