spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 18 February 2009
doi: 10.1242/dev.030957


Development 136, 1063-1069 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dev.030957v1
136/7/1063    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guo, G.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guo, G.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Report

Klf4 reverts developmentally programmed restriction of ground state pluripotency

Ge Guo1,2, Jian Yang1,2, Jennifer Nichols1,3, John Simon Hall1,2,*, Isobel Eyres1, William Mansfield1 and Austin Smith1,2,{dagger}

1 Wellcome Trust Centre for Stem Cell Research, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK.
2 Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK.
3 Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK.

{dagger} Author for correspondence (e-mail: austin.smith{at}cscr.cam.ac.uk)

Accepted 30 January 2009

SUMMARY

Mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells derived from pluripotent early epiblast contribute functionally differentiated progeny to all foetal lineages of chimaeras. By contrast, epistem cell (EpiSC) lines from post-implantation epithelialised epiblast are unable to colonise the embryo even though they express the core pluripotency genes Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog. We examined interconversion between these two cell types. ES cells can readily become EpiSCs in response to growth factor cues. By contrast, EpiSCs do not change into ES cells. We exploited PiggyBac transposition to introduce a single reprogramming factor, Klf4, into EpiSCs. No effect was apparent in EpiSC culture conditions, but in ground state ES cell conditions a fraction of cells formed undifferentiated colonies. These EpiSC-derived induced pluripotent stem (Epi-iPS) cells activated expression of ES cell-specific transcripts including endogenous Klf4, and downregulated markers of lineage specification. X chromosome silencing in female cells, a feature of the EpiSC state, was erased in Epi-iPS cells. They produced high-contribution chimaeras that yielded germline transmission. These properties were maintained after Cre-mediated deletion of the Klf4 transgene, formally demonstrating complete and stable reprogramming of developmental phenotype. Thus, re-expression of Klf4 in an appropriate environment can regenerate the naïve ground state from EpiSCs. Reprogramming is dependent on suppression of extrinsic growth factor stimuli and proceeds to completion in less than 1% of cells. This substantiates the argument that EpiSCs are developmentally, epigenetically and functionally differentiated from ES cells. However, because a single transgene is the minimum requirement to attain the ground state, EpiSCs offer an attractive opportunity for screening for unknown components of the reprogramming process.

Key words: Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell, Chimaera, Leukaemia inhibitory factor (Lif), Reprogramming, Mitogen-activated protein kinase (Erk) kinase (Mek/Mkk), Embryonic stem (ES) cell


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
K. Hayashi and M. A. Surani
Self-renewing epiblast stem cells exhibit continual delineation of germ cells with epigenetic reprogramming in vitro
Development, November 1, 2009; 136(21): 3549 - 3556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
J. Nichols, J. Silva, M. Roode, and A. Smith
Suppression of Erk signalling promotes ground state pluripotency in the mouse embryo
Development, October 1, 2009; 136(19): 3215 - 3222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
I. Chambers and S. R. Tomlinson
The transcriptional foundation of pluripotency
Development, July 15, 2009; 136(14): 2311 - 2322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
G. Guo, J. Yang, J. Nichols, J. S. Hall, I. Eyres, W. Mansfield, and A. Smith
Klf4 reverts developmentally programmed restriction of ground state pluripotency
J. Cell Sci., April 1, 2009; 122(7): e706 - e706.
[Full Text]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009