spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


J Embryol Exp Morphol 4, 176-189 (1956)
Published by The Company of Biologists 1956
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Walker, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, F. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Closure of the Secondary Palate in Three Strains of Mice

B. E. Walker1 and F. C. Fraser

Department of Genetics, McGill University, Montreal

1 Present address: Department of Anatomy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Received for publication 20 September 1955.

SUMMARY

At the time when Peter reviewed the subject of secondary mammalian palate embryology (Peter, 1924), it had been established that the secondary palate is derived from two shelves of tissue, which originate in the dorsolateral wall of the oral cavity and grow downward toward the lower jaw, passing lateral to the tongue. The shelves subsequently come to lie in the transverse plane dorsal to the tongue, where they fuse with the nasal septum and with each other, thus forming the roof of the mouth. The problem in this sequence is how the shelves manage to reach a position dorsal to the tongue after having had the tongue tightly wedged between them. Various mechanisms postulated to explain this change of position were reviewed by Lazzaro in 1940. The theories fell into three categories: (1) external forces such as muscular pressure by the tongue, (2) growth changes involving regression of the ventral portion and an outgrowth in the horizontal plane; and (3) a rapid rotation of the shelves due to some intrinsic force.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1956