spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mann, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lovell-Badge, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mann, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lovell-Badge, R. H.

Development, Vol 99, Issue 3 411-416, Copyright © 1987 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

The development of XO gynogenetic mouse embryos

JR Mann and RH Lovell-Badge
MRC Mammalian Development Unit, University College London, UK.

Diploid gynogenetic embryos, which have two sets of maternal and no paternal chromosomes, die at or soon after implantation. Since normal female embryos preferentially inactivate the paternally derived X chromosome in certain extraembryonic membranes, the inviability of diploid gynogenetic embryos might be due to difficulties in achieving an equivalent inactivation of one of their two maternally derived X chromosomes. In order to investigate this possibility, we constructed XO gynogenetic embryos by nuclear transplantation at the 1-cell stage. These XO gynogenones showed the same mortality around the time of implantation as did their XX gynogenetic counterparts. This shows that the lack of a paternally derived autosome set is sufficient to cause gynogenetic inviability at this stage. Autosomal imprinting and its possible relation to X-chromosome imprinting is discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. Sha and A. Fire
Imprinting Capacity of Gamete Lineages in Caenorhabditis elegans
Genetics, August 1, 2005; 170(4): 1633 - 1652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
Y Marahrens, B Panning, J Dausman, W Strauss, and R Jaenisch
Xist-deficient mice are defective in dosage compensation but not spermatogenesis.
Genes & Dev., January 15, 1997; 11(2): 156 - 166.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
P E Szabo and J R Mann
Biallelic expression of imprinted genes in the mouse germ line: implications for erasure, establishment, and mechanisms of genomic imprinting.
Genes & Dev., August 1, 1995; 9(15): 1857 - 1868.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1987