|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search | ||||
The fully linked HTML version of this article has now been published.
Although all bilaterian animals have a related set of Hox genes, the genomic organization of this gene complement comes in different flavors. In some unrelated species, Hox genes are clustered; in others, they are not. This indicates that the bilaterian ancestor had a clustered Hox gene family and that, subsequently, this genomic organization was either maintained or lost. Remarkably, the tightest organization is found in vertebrates, raising the embarrassingly finalistic possibility that vertebrates have maintained best this ancestral configuration. Alternatively, could they have co-evolved with an increased 'organization' of the Hox clusters, possibly linked to their genomic amplification, which would be at odds with our current perception of evolutionary mechanisms? When discussing the why's and how's of Hox gene clustering, we need to account for three points: the mechanisms of cluster evolution; the underlying biological constraints; and the developmental modes of the animals under consideration. By integrating these parameters, general conclusions emerge that can help solve the aforementioned dilemma. "See my son, here time becomes space"
Gurnemanz, in Parsifal (R. Wagner)
This article has been cited by other articles:
Development ePress online publication date 6 Jun 2007
doi: 10.1242/dev.001065
This Article 
Full Text (PDF)
All Versions of this Article:
dev.001065v1
134/14/2549
most recent
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Citing Articles via HighWire
Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Articles by Duboule, D.
Search for Related Content
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Duboule, D.
Social Bookmarking
What's this?
Review
The rise and fall of Hox gene clusters
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: Denis.Duboule{at}zoo.unige.ch)
CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
V. Ravi, K. Lam, B.-H. Tay, A. Tay, S. Brenner, and B. Venkatesh
Elephant shark (Callorhinchus milii) provides insights into the evolution of Hox gene clusters in gnathostomes
PNAS,
September 22, 2009;
106(38):
16327 - 16332.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
S. Jimenez-Delgado, J. Pascual-Anaya, and J. Garcia-Fernandez
Implications of duplicated cis-regulatory elements in the evolution of metazoans: the DDI model or how simplicity begets novelty
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic,
August 3, 2009;
(2009)
elp029v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
N. Soshnikova and D. Duboule
Epigenetic Temporal Control of Mouse Hox Genes in Vivo
Science,
June 5, 2009;
324(5932):
1320 - 1323.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
N. Di-Poi, J. I. Montoya-Burgos, and D. Duboule
Atypical relaxation of structural constraints in Hox gene clusters of the green anole lizard
Genome Res.,
April 1, 2009;
19(4):
602 - 610.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
M. Minoux, G. S. Antonarakis, M. Kmita, D. Duboule, and F. M. Rijli
Rostral and caudal pharyngeal arches share a common neural crest ground pattern
Development,
February 15, 2009;
136(4):
637 - 645.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
D. L. Garaulet, D. Foronda, M. Calleja, and E. Sanchez-Herrero
Polycomb-dependent Ultrabithorax Hox gene silencing induced by high Ultrabithorax levels in Drosophila
Development,
October 1, 2008;
135(19):
3219 - 3228.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
S. Mungpakdee, H.-C. Seo, A. R. Angotzi, X. Dong, A. Akalin, and D. Chourrout
Differential Evolution of the 13 Atlantic Salmon Hox Clusters
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
July 1, 2008;
25(7):
1333 - 1343.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
J. Deschamps
Tailored Hox gene transcription and the making of the thumb
Genes & Dev.,
February 1, 2008;
22(3):
293 - 296.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007