spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search    

The fully linked HTML version of this article has now been published.
Development ePress online publication date 26 Nov 2003
doi: 10.1242/dev.00919


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dev.00919v1
131/1/105    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, D.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Shankland, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, D.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Shankland, M.

Research article

A distinct patterning mechanism of O and P cell fates in the development of the rostral segments of the leech Helobdella robusta: implications for the evolutionary dissociation of developmental pathway and morphological outcome


Dian-Han Kuo* and Marty Shankland
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: dhkuo{at}mail.utexas.edu)

Despite a high degree of homonomy in the segmental organization of the ectoderm, the body plan of the leech is divided into two zones based on the distinct cell lineage patterns that give rise to the O/P portion of the segmental ectoderm. In the midbody and caudal segments, each segmental repeat of ectoderm arises in part from one 'o' blast cell and one 'p' blast cell. These two blast cells are positionally specified to distinct O and P fates, and give rise to differentiated descendant cells called O and P pattern elements, respectively. In the rostral segments, each segmental repeat of O and P pattern elements arises from a single 'op' blast cell. Based on their developmental fates and their responses to the ablation of neighboring cells, the granddaughters of the primary op blast cell are categorized into two O-type cells and two P-type cells. The O-type cells do not require the presence of the rest of the op blast cell clone for their normal development. By contrast, normal development of the P-type cells depends upon interactions with the other OP sublineages. Additional experiments showed that the O-type cells are the source of a repressive signal involved in the normal fate specification of the P-type cells. Our data suggest that the cell interactions involved in fate specification differ substantially in the rostral and midbody segments, even though the set of differentiated descendants produced by the rostral OP pathway and the midbody O and P pathways are very similar.







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003