|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search | ||||
The fully linked HTML version of this article has now been published.
A crucial step in generating the segmented body plan in Drosophila is establishing stripes of expression of several key segment-polarity genes, one stripe for each parasegment, in the blastoderm stage embryo. It is well established that these patterns are generated in response to regulation by the transcription factors encoded by the pair-rule segmentation genes. However, the full set of positional cues that drive expression in either the odd- or even-numbered parasegments has not been defined for any of the segment-polarity genes. Among the complications for dissecting the pair-rule to segment-polarity transition are the regulatory interactions between the different pair-rule genes. We have used an ectopic expression system that allows for quantitative manipulation of expression levels to probe the role of the primary pair-rule transcription factor Runt in segment-polarity gene regulation. These experiments identify sloppy paired 1 (slp1) as a gene that is activated and repressed by Runt in a simple combinatorial parasegment-dependent manner. The combination of Runt and Odd-paired (Opa) is both necessary and sufficient for slp1 activation in all somatic blastoderm nuclei that do not express the Fushi tarazu (Ftz) transcription factor. By contrast, the specific combination of Runt + Ftz is sufficient for slp1 repression in all blastoderm nuclei. We furthermore find that Ftz modulates the Runt-dependent regulation of the segment-polarity genes wingless (wg) and engrailed (en). However, in the case of en the combination of Runt + Ftz gives activation. The contrasting responses of different downstream targets to Runt in the presence or absence of Ftz is thus central to the combinatorial logic of the pair-rule to segment-polarity transition. The unique and simple rules for slp1 regulation make this an attractive target for dissecting the molecular mechanisms of Runt-dependent regulation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Development ePress online publication date 21 Apr 2004
doi: 10.1242/dev.01109
This Article ![]()
![]()
Full Text (PDF)
![]()
All Versions of this Article:
dev.01109v1
131/10/2281
most recent![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
![]()
Citing Articles ![]()
![]()
Citing Articles via HighWire
![]()
Citing Articles via Google Scholar
![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Swantek, D. ![]()
Articles by Gergen, J. P. ![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Swantek, D.
![]()
Articles by Gergen, J. P.
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?
Research article
Ftz modulates Runt-dependent activation and repression of segment-polarity gene transcription
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: pgergen{at}life.bio.sunysb.edu)
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
P. Rangan, M. DeGennaro, and R. Lehmann
Regulating Gene Expression in the Drosophila Germ Line
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol,
March 6, 2009;
(2009)
sqb.2008.73.057v1.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
M. Chaves and R. Albert
Studying the effect of cell division on expression patterns of the segment polarity genes
J R Soc Interface,
August 6, 2008;
5(Suppl_1):
S71 - S84.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
X. Wang, C. Lee, D. S. Gilmour, and J. P. Gergen
Transcription elongation controls cell fate specification in the Drosophila embryo
Genes & Dev.,
May 1, 2007;
21(9):
1031 - 1036.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
Y. Hanzawa, T. Money, and D. Bradley
A single amino acid converts a repressor to an activator of flowering
PNAS,
May 24, 2005;
102(21):
7748 - 7753.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004