spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search    

The fully linked HTML version of this article has now been published.
Development ePress online publication date 16 Apr 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.020180


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dev.020180v1
135/10/1843    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holmberg, J.
Right arrow Articles by Muhr, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holmberg, J.
Right arrow Articles by Muhr, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research article

SoxB1 transcription factors and Notch signaling use distinct mechanisms to regulate proneural gene function and neural progenitor differentiation


Johan Holmberg, Emil Hansson, Michal Malewicz, Magnus Sandberg, Thomas Perlmann, Urban Lendahl, and Jonas Muhr*
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jonas.muhr{at}licr.ki.se)

The preservation of a pool of neural precursors is a prerequisite for proper establishment and maintenance of a functional central nervous system (CNS). Both Notch signaling and SoxB1 transcription factors have been ascribed key roles during this process, but whether these factors use common or distinct mechanisms to control progenitor maintenance is unsettled. Here, we report that the capacity of Notch to maintain neural cells in an undifferentiated state requires the activity of SoxB1 proteins, whereas the mechanism by which SoxB1 block neurogenesis is independent of Notch signaling. A common feature of Notch signaling and SoxB1 proteins is their ability to inhibit the activity of proneural bHLH proteins. Notch represses the transcription of proneural bHLH genes, while SoxB1 proteins block their neurogenic capacity. Moreover, E-proteins act as functional partners of proneural proteins and the suppression of E-protein expression is an important mechanism by which Notch counteracts neurogenesis. Interestingly, in contrast to the Hes-dependent repression of proneural genes, suppression of E-protein occurs in a Hes-independent fashion. Together, these data reveal that Notch signaling and SoxB1 transcription factors use distinct regulatory mechanisms to control proneural protein function and to preserve neural cells as undifferentiated precursors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
R. X. Norman, H. W. Ko, V. Huang, C. M. Eun, L. L. Abler, Z. Zhang, X. Sun, and J. T. Eggenschwiler
Tubby-like protein 3 (TULP3) regulates patterning in the mouse embryo through inhibition of Hedgehog signaling
Hum. Mol. Genet., May 15, 2009; 18(10): 1740 - 1754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
J. Holmberg, E. Hansson, M. Malewicz, M. Sandberg, T. Perlmann, U. Lendahl, and J. Muhr
SoxB1 transcription factors and Notch signaling use distinct mechanisms to regulate proneural gene function and neural progenitor differentiation
J. Cell Sci., May 15, 2008; 121(10): e1007 - e1007.
[Full Text]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008