|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search | ||||
The fully linked HTML version of this article has now been published.
Mutations in SMAD tumor suppressor genes are involved in approximately 140,000 new cancers in the USA each year. At this time, how the absence of a functional SMAD protein leads to a tumor is unknown. However, clinical and biochemical studies suggest that all SMAD mutations are loss-of-function mutations. One prediction of this hypothesis is that all SMAD mutations cause tumors via a single mechanism. To test this hypothesis, we expressed five tumor-derived alleles of human SMAD genes and five mutant alleles of Drosophila SMAD genes in flies. We found that all of the DNA-binding domain mutations conferred gain-of-function activity, thereby falsifying the hypothesis. Furthermore, two types of gain-of-function mutation were identified - dominant negative and neomorphic. In numerous assays, the neomorphic allele SMAD4100T appears to be capable of activating the expression of WG target genes. These results imply that SMAD4100T may induce tumor formation by a fundamentally different mechanism from other SMAD mutations, perhaps via the ectopic expression of WNT target genes - an oncogenic mechanism associated with mutations in Adenomatous Polyposis Coli. Our results are likely to have clinical implications, because gain-of-function mutations may cause tumors when heterozygous, and the life expectancy of individuals with SMAD4100T is likely to be different from those with other SMAD mutations. From a larger perspective, our study shows that the genetic characterization of missense mutations, particularly in modular proteins, requires experimental verification.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Development ePress online publication date 28 Sep 2005
doi: 10.1242/dev.02048
This Article ![]()
![]()
Full Text (PDF)
![]()
All Versions of this Article:
dev.02048v1
132/21/4883
most recent![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
![]()
Citing Articles ![]()
![]()
Citing Articles via HighWire
![]()
Citing Articles via Google Scholar
![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Takaesu, N. T. ![]()
Articles by Newfeld, S. J. ![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Takaesu, N. T.
![]()
Articles by Newfeld, S. J.
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?
Research article: Development and disease
DNA-binding domain mutations in SMAD genes yield dominant-negative proteins or a neomorphic protein that can activate WG target genes in Drosophila
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: newfeld{at}asu.edu)
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
P. Kahlem and S. J. Newfeld
Informatics approaches to understanding TGF{beta} pathway regulation
Development,
November 15, 2009;
136(22):
3729 - 3740.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
K. T. Eade and D. W. Allan
Neuronal Phenotype in the Mature Nervous System Is Maintained by Persistent Retrograde Bone Morphogenetic Protein Signaling
J. Neurosci.,
March 25, 2009;
29(12):
3852 - 3864.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
S. K. Lim and F. M. Hoffmann
Smad4 cooperates with lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1/T cell-specific factor to increase c-myc expression in the absence of TGF-beta signaling
PNAS,
December 5, 2006;
103(49):
18580 - 18585.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
N. T. Takaesu, C. Hyman-Walsh, Y. Ye, R. G. Wisotzkey, M. J. Stinchfield, M. B. O'Connor, D. Wotton, and S. J. Newfeld
dSno Facilitates Baboon Signaling in the Drosophila Brain by Switching the Affinity of Medea Away From Mad and Toward dSmad2
Genetics,
November 1, 2006;
174(3):
1299 - 1313.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005