spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search    

The fully linked HTML version of this article has now been published.
Development ePress online publication date 1 Feb 2006
doi: 10.1242/dev.02254


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dev.02254v1
133/5/889    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saha, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schaffer, D. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saha, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schaffer, D. V.

Research article

Signal dynamics in Sonic hedgehog tissue patterning


Krishanu Saha and David V. Schaffer*
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: schaffer{at}cchem.berkeley.edu)

During development, secreted signaling factors, called morphogens, instruct cells to adopt specific mature phenotypes. However, the mechanisms that morphogen systems employ to establish a precise concentration gradient for patterning tissue architecture are highly complex and are typically analyzed only at long times after secretion (i.e. steady state). We have developed a theoretical model that analyzes dynamically how the intricate transport and signal transduction mechanisms of a model morphogen, Sonic hedgehog (Shh), cooperate in modular fashion to regulate tissue patterning in the neural tube. Consistent with numerous recent studies, the model elucidates how the dynamics of gradient formation can be a key determinant of cell response. In addition, this work yields several novel insights into how different transport mechanisms or 'modules' control pattern formation. The model predicts that slowing the transport of a morphogen, such as by lipid modification of the ligand Shh, by ligand binding to proteoglycans, or by the moderate upregulation of dedicated transport molecules like Dispatched, can actually increase the signaling range of the morphogen by concentrating it near the secretion source. Furthermore, several transcriptional targets of Shh, such as Patched and Hedgehog-interacting protein, significantly limit its signaling range by slowing transport and promoting ligand degradation. This modeling approach elucidates how individual modular elements that operate dynamically at various times during patterning can shape a tissue pattern.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
E. Dessaud, A. P. McMahon, and J. Briscoe
Pattern formation in the vertebrate neural tube: a sonic hedgehog morphogen-regulated transcriptional network
Development, August 1, 2008; 135(15): 2489 - 2503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
X. Huang, Y. Litingtung, and C. Chiang
Region-specific requirement for cholesterol modification of sonic hedgehog in patterning the telencephalon and spinal cord
Development, June 1, 2007; 134(11): 2095 - 2105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
D. C. Martinelli and C.-M. Fan
Gas1 extends the range of Hedgehog action by facilitating its signaling
Genes & Dev., May 15, 2007; 21(10): 1231 - 1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006