spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parker, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cadigan, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parker, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cadigan, K. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Pygopus, a nuclear PHD-finger protein required for Wingless signaling in Drosophila

David S. Parker, Jemileh Jemison and Kenneth M. Cadigan*

Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Natural Science Building, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA



View larger version (155K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Expression from EP(3)1076 or UAS-pygo suppresses a Wg signaling-dependant small eye phenotype. Micrographs of adult Drosophila eyes all containing P[GMR-Gal4] and the following additional transgenes: (A) P[UAS-lacZ] (two copies); (B) P[UAS-wg], P[UAS-lacZ]; (C) P[UAS-wg], EP(3)1076; (D) P[UAS-wg], P[UAS- pygo]1–1; (E) P[GMR-arm*], P[UAS-lacZ]; (F) P[GMR-arm*], EP(3)1076. Expression of wg with the GMR promoter produces an eye that is severely reduced in size (B) that is prevented by EP(3)1076 or P[UAS- pygo] (C,D). Expression of an activated form of Arm (Freeman and Bienz, 2001Go) causes a similar reduced eye (E) that is dramatically suppressed by EP(3)1076 (F) or P[UAS- pygo] (data not shown). Unless otherwise noted, each transgene is present in one copy/fly and cultures were reared at 25°C.

 


View larger version (50K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Cartoon of the pygo locus and mutant alleles and pygo expression profile. (A) The pygo locus with flanking genes rough deal (rod) and {gamma}-cop. The location and orientation of the EP(3)1076 transposon is also shown. Besides the Gal4-dependent dominant phenotypes seen with EP(3)1076, the transposon also causes a Gal4-independent recessive phenotype (referred to as pygoEP). (B) Depiction of two additional pygo loss-of-function alleles created by imprecise excision of EP(3)1076. pygo10 contains half of the transposon and removes the splice acceptor site in the 5' UTR intron of the pygo gene, and the first 295 residues of the Pygo ORF. It does not affect rod (see Results). The pygo9 mutation extends further upstream of pygo, and inactivates rod as well. In situ hybridization of embryos (C-F) and wing imaginal discs (G,H) with a probe for pygo. Preblastoderm wild-type embryo (C) shows high levels of staining that are absent in pygo10 germline clones (D). At stage 10, wild-type embryos (E) show ubiquitous staining at a much lower level than in C (the preparation was allowed to develop much longer). Stage 10 embryos maternally and zygotically mutant for the pygo10 allele (F; identified by their altered morphology) presumably indicate the level of background staining under these conditions. Late third instar wing imaginal discs show low levels of ubiquitous signal (G), while discs containing random clones of Gal4-expressing cells (via an actin promoter) in a EP(3)1076 background show patches of cells (arrows) with much higher levels of pygo transcripts (H).

 


View larger version (70K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Overexpression of pygo blocks several Wg readouts. (A-I) Confocal images of third instar wing imaginal discs containing random clones of cells overexpressing pygo. The clones were marked with GFP (A,D,G) and immunostained with antibodies against Wg (B), Sens (E) or Dll (H). Merged images are shown (C,F,I). Derepression of Wg (B,C) and lack of Sens (E,F; n=9) and Dll (H,I) expression were observed, consistent with a block in Wg signaling. The arrows in I indicate boundary regions that are clearly GFP positive (and thus expressing pygo) where Dll expression is not reduced. (J,K) Third instar mesothoracic legs of from P[Ptc-Gal4]/+ (J) and P[Ptc-Gal4]/P[UAS- pygo] (K) larva. dpp expression is monitored using P[dpp-lacZ]. (J) Wild-type pattern, with lacZ repressed on the ventral side of the disc (arrow). When pygo is overexpressed in this domain, 37% of the legs exhibit complete derepression of lacZ on the ventral side (arrow in K indicates a representative of this group); 41% show moderate derepression and 22% show slight or no depression (data not shown; n=27).

 


View larger version (116K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. pygo is required for Wg signaling in the embryo. (A-E) Micrographs of cuticles of wild-type (A), wgCX4 (B), pygo10 maternal/zygotic mutant (C), a pygo10 maternal mutant without (D) or with (E) a P[UAS- pygo] transgene. The mothers in D,E are heterozygous for P[Da-Gal4]. The absence of maternal and zygotic pygo results in a denticle lawn similar to that observed in wg mutants (compare panel B with C). Paternal rescue of the pygo germline clone gives a variable phenotype (see Table 1 for more details), with most cuticles having four to seven abdominal denticles (the one in D has six). Further rescue was observed with the P[UAS- pygo] transgene driven by P[Da-Gal4] (Table 1), with the example shown in E having seven denticles (arrow indicates the partial fusion of the fourth and fifth abdominal denticles belts). (F-N) Confocal images of wild type (F,I,L), wgCX4 (G,J,M) or pygo10 maternal/zygotic mutant embryos (H,K,N) stained with antibodies against En (F-H), Wg (I-K) or Eve (L-N). The embryos in F-K are at mid-stage 10 and the ones in L-N are at stage 13. Embryos that lack zygotic pygo were unambiguously identified by the absence of eve-lacZ staining. Note that at mid-stage 10 (judged by the extent of stomodeum invagination), when wild-type and wg mutants are at full germband extension (most clear in F and I), the pygo mutants have incomplete extension (clear in H but even more obvious in K). As described in the text, the En and Wg stripes are largely absent at this stage in pygo mutants (H,K), though the residual epidermal En expression (arrows) is not observed in wg mutants (G). The Eve pericardial expression (arrow in L) is absent in wg and pygo mutants (arrows in M and N), while Eve expression in the CNS is present (arrowheads).

 


View larger version (140K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. pygo is required for Wg signaling in imaginal discs. (A) Micrograph of an adult wing with a pygo10 clone, showing a loss of wing margin and the accompanying bristles. Note that in place of the slender bristles (arrowhead) normally found adjacent to the stout bristles, the tissue next to the clone has ectopic stout bristles (arrows). This is characteristic of a clone that lacks Wg signaling (Rulifson et al., 1996Go). (B-E) Confocal images of wing imaginal discs stained for Wg (B), Sens (C) and Dll (D,E). Clones of pygo10 (marked by the absence of Arm-lacZ; not shown, clonal boundaries shown by the white lines). The normal domain of Wg expression is not affected, but Wg expression is derepressed in the adjoining area inside the pygo clone (B). Sens is missing in the pygo clone (C) and Dll is either completely absent (D), severely reduced (not shown) or modestly affected (E). (F,I) Micrographs of male mesothoracic legs of wild type (F) or a pygoEP homozygote (I). The arrows indicate the position of the sex comb, a row of bristles found on the ventral side of the leg, which is missing in the pygo mutant (I). (G,H) Micrographs of third instar leg imaginal discs stained for dpp-lacZ in wild type (G) and pygoEP mutants (H). The dorsal marker dpp-lacZ is derepressed on the ventral side of the pygo mutants.

 


View larger version (132K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. pygo is epistatic to Axin. (A-C) Confocal images of wing imaginal discs stained for Sens. Clones (indicated by the white lines) of pygo10 (A), Axin (B) and Axin, pygo10 (C) indicate that the double mutant phenotype (loss of Sens in the clone) is identical to pygo. (D-F) Confocal images of eye-antennal imaginal discs stained for the photoreceptor marker Elav (red) and clonal marker lacZ (green). Clones (indicated by lack of ß-gal staining) of pygo10 (D), Axin (E) and Axin, pygo10 (F) indicate that the double mutant phenotype (unaffected photoreceptor clusters in the clones) is identical to pygo.

 


View larger version (116K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. pygo encodes a nuclear protein that acts downstream of Arm nuclear import. (A-I) Confocal images of wing imaginal discs stained for Arm (red) and a NPC antigen (green). Arrows indicate nucleoplasm. Clones (indicated by the white lines) of pygo10 (A,D,G), Axin (B,E,H) and Axin, pygo10 (C,F,I) indicate that the double mutant phenotype (high levels of nuclear Arm; see arrows in H,I) is nearly identical to Axin. (J-L) Confocal image of a S2 cell transiently transfected with a GFP-Pygo chimeric gene driven by the constitutive Actin5C promoter. NPC staining is shown in red and GFP in green. Almost all the GFP signal is found in the nucleus. All images are single optical slices of <1 µm depth.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002