
View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. (A) EMSA of embryonic extract binding to HBX2. Binding was performed with wild type (WT) and mutant HBX2 (mE1, mE2 and mE1+2) probes. Competition was performed with 200x, 50x and 12.5x excess of unlabelled WT probe (lanes 5-7 respectively), and 200x excess of unlabelled mE1+2 competitor (lane 8). (B) EMSA of in vitro translated protein binding to HBX2. Of the proteins tested, Xcad-2, Xcad-3 and Xvent-1 were found to bind to HBX2. The lane marked Control represents the interaction between the HBX2 probe and uncharged reticulocyte lysate. *Denotes nonspecific DNA binding. Shown below is an autoradiograph of in vitro transcribed proteins, following reticulocyte transcription/translation reaction in the presence of [35S]methionine. (C) Interaction of Xvent-1 with E1 and E2. Left hand panel shows the binding of Xvent-1 to wild-type (WT) and mutant HBX2 probes (mE1 and mE2). Competition analyses are shown in the right hand panel. Competition was performed with 200x, 50x and 12.5x excess of unlabelled WT probe (lanes 9-11 respectively), and 200x excess of unlabelled mE2 competitor (lane 12). *Denotes nonspecific DNA binding.
|