spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koh, K.
Right arrow Articles by Rothman, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koh, K.
Right arrow Articles by Rothman, J. H.

Cell fates and fusion in the C. elegans vulval primordium are regulated by the EGL-18 and ELT-6 GATA factors — apparent direct targets of the LIN-39 Hox protein

Kyunghee Koh1,*, Sara M. Peyrot2, Cricket G. Wood1, Javier A. Wagmaister2, Morris F. Maduro1, David M. Eisenmann2 and Joel H. Rothman1,{dagger}

1 Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA
* Present address: Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA



View larger version (114K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Phenotypes of egl-18 chromosomal mutants. (A) Surface view of a wild-type L1 larva. Alae are clearly visible as two unbroken lines along the length of the body. (B) Surface view of an egl-18(n475) L1 larva, showing breaks in alae (arrows) and a twisted body (the basis for the Rol phenotype). (C) Wild-type vulval opening at the `Christmas tree' (L4) stage larva. (D) Defective vulval opening of an egl-18(n475) larva at the L4 stage. (E,F) Adult hermaphrodites, showing the wild-type vulva (E) and the protruding vulva (Pv1) phenotype (F). In these and subsequent photos, anterior is towards the left and dorsal is towards the top.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Mutations in the egl-18 gene. Boxes represent exons and lines represent introns. The nature of each mutation is described in the lower part of the figure. The numbers in parentheses indicate the position of the changed bases in the genomic sequence relative to the egl-18 ATG.

 


View larger version (56K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Vulval phenotypes of egl-18(RNAi) animals rescued for lethality by wEx1070. (A) Nomarski image of a wild-type vulval opening at the `Christmas tree' (L4) stage. (B) Nomarski image of an egl-18(RNAi); wEx1070 animal, in which all of the six P3.p-P8.p cells (arrows) did not divide and appear to have fused. (C) ajm-1::GFP (adherens junction marker) expression in a wildtype animal at the early L3 stage. All six VPCs (arrowheads) are clearly demarcated by ajm-1::GFP. One of the VPCs is partially out of focus in this image. (D) ajm-1::GFP expression in an egl-18(RNAi); wEx1070 animal at a similar stage to the animal shown in C. All but one VPC are in the process of fusion as indicated by fragmented ajm-1::GFP expression (arrows). One VPC remains unfused as shown by a complete ring (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (81K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Expression of egl-18/elt-6::GFP. (A-C) Expression of pKK63 containing an ~800 bp enhancer and a basal promoter. (A) L2 larva, in which all VPCs (P3.p-P8.p) show approximately equal levels of GFP expression (arrows). All six VC neurons show GFP expression, although not all are visible in this focal plane. Arrowhead indicate a VC neuron. (B) L3 larva shortly before VPC divisions, showing stronger GFP expression in P5.p-P7.p cells than in P4.p and P8.p. (C) L3 larva after the first VPC cell divisions. Daughters of P6.p show higher GFP expression than daughters of P5.p and P7.p. GFP expression is not detectable in P4.px and P8.px cells. (D) Early-L3 larva showing expression of an elt-6 transcriptional fusion pKK41 in P5.p-P7.p cells. pKK41 contains ~8 kb of genomic sequence upstream of the elt-6 ATG, including the ~800 bp enhancer in pKK63 (Koh and Rothman, 2001Go).

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. (A) Hox/PBC-binding sites in the egl-18 and elt-6 genomic region and GFP reporter constructs. Open reading frames of egl-18 and elt-6 are indicated by black and gray boxes, respectively. Introns and 5' and 3' UTRs are indicated by lines. Triangles indicate consensus Hox/PBC-binding sites, two of which in the second intron of egl-18 are labeled sites 1 and 2. (B) Alignment of C. elegans site 1 and the corresponding C. briggsae sequence. The region corresponding to C. elegans site 2 is not conserved in C. briggsae.

 


View larger version (53K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. LIN-39 and CEH-20 bind cooperatively to two consensus Hox/PBC binding sites in vitro. The bottom arrow indicates bands corresponding to probes bound to LIN-39 alone and the top arrow indicates bands corresponding to probes bound to LIN-39/CEH-20 heterodimers. In the first four lanes, an oligonucleotide (Antp/Exd) containing a binding site for a Drosophila Hox protein, Antennapedia, and its co-factor, Extradenticle, is used as a positive control. LIN-39 and CEH-20 bind the wild-type site 1 (S1) and site 2 (S2) efficiently, but not the mutated sites (S1M and S2M). Site 2 shows greater binding affinity for LIN-39/CEH-20 heterodimers than does site 1, and LIN-39 alone can bind site 2 but not site 1.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002