spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00155


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerberding, M.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gerberding, M.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, N. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cell lineage analysis of the amphipod crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis reveals an early restriction of cell fates

Matthias Gerberding1,3, William E. Browne2 and Nipam H. Patel1,3,*

1 Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
2 Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
3 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA



View larger version (51K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Overview of Parhyale development. (A) Living eight-cell embryo. Dorsal view, anterior upwards. After the third division, there are four macromeres and four micromeres. (B) The nomenclature of the macromeres and micromeres projected on the egg of (A). The smallest macromere is called `Mv', the other macromeres moving clockwise are called `Er', `Ep' and `El'. The smallest micromere (sister of `Mv') is called `g', the other micromeres moving clockwise are called `mr', `en' and `ml'. (C) Dorsal view of a living egg at 12 hours. This stage is nicknamed the `soccerball' stage, and at this stage there are ~100 superficially located cells of roughly the same size. (D-G) DAPI stained embryos. (D) The early germband at day 3. Ventral view, anterior upwards. The first landmarks of the germ band are the head lobes (arrows). At this stage, the trunk ectoderm is organizing itself into a remarkably precise grid of rows and columns, with each initial row giving rise eventually to a single parasegment of the animal. Cells are still being added to the germband at the posterior (asterisk). The overall organization shows a marked AP gradient of development. (E-H) Lateral views, anterior leftwards. (E) Germband extension at day 4. As the germband extends, it acquires a sharp ventral infolding (arrowhead; head indicated by arrow, telson by asterisk). In this embryo, the segments anterior to the fifth thoracic segment and posterior to approximately the middle of the abdomen are at the ventral surface of the egg, while the remaining thoracic and abdominal segments are within the infolded region. (F) The extended germband at day 5. The infolding has extended to the point where only the telson and segments anterior to the mandible still lie at the ventral surface of the egg. At this stage, the appendages are distinct from the body wall (second antenna marked by arrow, telson by asterisk). (G) The embryo at day 9. By this time, the adult morphology has been established as Parhyale is a direct developer (compare with H). (H) A living gravid adult female carrying eggs in her ventral brood pouch (arrow). Scale bar: 100 µm in A-G; 2 mm in H.

 


View larger version (112K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Development of ectoderm clones during germband formation. Ventral views, anterior upwards. Arrows denote the location of the midline. Top, middle and bottom rows show the three ectoderm clones resulting from injecting macromeres `Er', `El' and `Ep', respectively. Anterior-right and anterior-left clones originate from `Er' and `El', respectively, and an unpaired posterior bilateral ectoderm clone originates from `Ep'. The distribution of these clones is complementary and their allocation to the three regions obeys strict rules in the gnathal and thoracic segments. In more anterior and more posterior segments, these rules are less strictly implemented (see text). (A-F) Brightfield images showing the Biotin-dextran injected clones. (A'-F') corresponding DAPI images. (A,B) The `Er' clone. Injection of `Er' gives an anterior ectoderm clone that is restricted to the right part of the embryo in the gnathal and thoracic segments. (A,A') Day 3. The ectodermal cells start to organize themselves into a regular grid pattern to which `Er' contributes the anterior right region. (B,B') Day 4.5. The anterior ectoderm is composed of ventral neuroectoderm and lateral and dorsal appendage and body wall ectoderm. `Er' has contributed the right part of all these regions of the anterior ectoderm. This clone has also contributed some scattered cells (arrowheads) to the posterior ectoderm, which still shows a grid-like arrangement. (C-D') The `El' clone. Injection of `El' gives an anterior ectoderm clone that is restricted to the left part of the embryo in the gnathal and thoracic segments. (C,C') Day 3.5. Dissected germband preparation showing that the `El' clone is restricted to the left side in the thorax and abdomen, but is on both sides in the anterior part of the head (asterisks on the left and right sides). Scattered contribution can also be seen in the more posterior ectoderm (arrowhead). (D,D') Day 4.5. `El' is contributing the left part of the anterior ectoderm in a way that is complementary to `Er'. (E,F) The `Ep' clone. Injection of `Ep' gives an unpaired posterior ectodermal clone that is excluded from the gnathal segments, is restricted to the single column of midline cells in the thoracic segments, and is bilateral throughout the abdomen. (E,E') Day 3.5. `Ep' is contributing to the midline of the thorax during the initial assembly of the grid pattern, as well as to the posterior ectoderm of the abdomen (arrowheads). (F,F') Day 4.5. `Ep' contributes to the thoracic midline plus the majority of the abdominal ectoderm. Owing to the infolding of the embryo, only the contribution to the most posterior part of the abdomen is visible here (arrowhead). Scale bar: 100 µm.

 


View larger version (69K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Development of the somatic mesoderm clones. (A-C) Ventral views, (D) lateral view. Arrows indicate the location of the midline. There are two unilateral mesodermal clones of left somatic and right somatic mesoderm derived from micromeres `ml' and `mr', respectively. (A) The mesoderm at day 3. Concomitant with the formation of the grid in the surface layer of the ectoderm, the internal mesoderm clones (here an `ml' clone) of each side generate an irregular array of cells that will contribute to the head mesoderm, plus four so-called mesoteloblasts (arrowheads). The mesoteloblasts are stem cells that in turn generate the segmental somatic mesoderm of all segments posterior to the mandible. (A') DAPI image of A, but focused more ventrally to reveal the overlying ectodermal grid. (B,B') The mesoderm at day 3.5. Living DsRed. T1 labeled `mr' clone, with the fluorescent image alone shown in B and overlaid with the brightfield image in B'. The four mesoteloblasts have generated several rows of segmental somatic mesoderm, each comprising four cells (arrowheads). The more anterior, non-teloblastic mesoderm occupies lateral, rounded domains within the head (asterisk marks one edge of this domain). (C) The mesoderm at day 4: Biotin-dextran label of an `ml' clone. The number of mesoderm cells per segment increases as the initial four cells in each segment proliferate (arrowhead). (D,D') The mesoderm at day 5. Living TRITC dextran labeled `ml' clone, with the brightfield image alone shown in D and overlaid with the fluorescent image in D'. The segmental mesoderm has started to populate the appendages (arrowhead). (E) Biotin dextran label of `ml' at day 6. High magnification view shows the mesoderm within several developing appendages.

 


View larger version (112K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Germ cell clones. The `g' micromere generates an unpaired bilateral germ cell clone that splits at mid-embryogenesis and populates the paired gonads. (A,A') The germ cells at day 3. The early migration of the germ cells from dorsal to ventral stops at germ band formation. The germ cells (arrowhead) form a single medially located internal cluster at the level of the mandibular segment. (A) Brightfield image showing the cluster of the three to five germ cells (arrowhead). (A') Corresponding DAPI image, but focused more ventrally on the ectodermal grid. (B,B') The germ cells at day 4. During germ band extension, the cluster splits into two halves that migrate laterally. (B) Brightfield image of a living embryo containing a DsRed. T1 mRNA labeled `g' clone. Even in brightfield only images of uninjected embryos, the germ cell clusters (white arrowhead) always stand out as they are more reflective than the surrounding cells. (B') Corresponding brightfield plus fluorescent images overlay. The DsRed. T1-labeled germ cells (arrowhead) are within the bright clusters seen in B. (C,C') The germ cells at day 4.5. The germ cells are migrating towards the dorsal side from day 4 to day 7. (C) Brightfield image of the Biotin dextran-labeled clone. During this stage of lateral migration, the germ cells (arrowheads) seem to lose adherence to each other and migrate as single cells. (C') Corresponding DAPI image of C, but focused more ventrally on the head appendages to show that the germ clusters are still within the gnathal region. (D) The germ cells at day 9. The two right and left germ cell clusters now populate the paired gonads (arrowheads). (D') Higher magnification view. The scattered black spots represent spurious DAB precipitation in the yolk. Scale bar: 80 µm in A-C',D; 100 µm in B,B'; 40 µm in D'.

 


View larger version (98K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The development of the endoderm and the visceral mesoderm. The gut is composed of two clones, an unpaired bilateral clone for the midgut endoderm that is derived from micromere `en', and an unpaired bilateral clone for the visceral mesoderm derived from macromere `Mv'. (A-H) Fluorescent images of TRITC dextran clones. (A'-H') Same fluorescent images, but overlaid with the corresponding brightfield images. (A-D) TRITC dextran labels of the endoderm progenitor `en'. (A) The `en' clone at day 3.5, ventral view: the clone is situated dorsally and anterior and starts to from an internal layer that expands posteriorly. (B) The `en' clone at day 5, ventral view: the clone has expanded underneath the germband ectoderm and mesoderm forming a continuous ventral layer. (C) The `en' clone at day 6, dorsal view: cells of the clone spread dorsally to envelope the yolk and form the tube structure of the midgut. (D) The `en' clone at day 7, dorsal view: the clone has enclosed the yolk completely. (E-H) Single labels of the visceral mesoderm progenitor `Mv'. (E) The `Mv' clone at day 3.5, ventral view: the clone is on the egg surface and lies anterior of the ectoderm material. (F) The `Mv' clone at day 4, ventral view: the clone is forming an internal layer and is migrating laterally and posteriorly. (G) The `Mv' clone at day 6, dorsal view: the clone is enclosing the yolk and endoderm (see below), and individual cells have processes that extend dorsally. (H) The clone at day 7, dorsal view: the clone has completely enclosed the yolk at the same time as the `en' clone. (I-K) Double labels of both `en' (red, TRITC dextran) and `Mv' (green, FITC dextran). (I) The clones at day 3, ventral view: during germband formation, the clones occupy different areas; `en' is dorsal and anterior to `Mv'. (J) The clones at day 5, ventral view: both clones have moved extensively, with the `Mv' cells now located ventral and external to the `en' cells (K) The clones at day 6, dorsal view: during the closure of the gut tube, the endoderm of `en' is internal to the visceral mesoderm `Mv'. (L) Schematic view on of the expansion of `en' (red arrows) and `Mv' (green arrows) between day 3 and day 6. Lateral view, anterior leftwards, dorsal upwards, yolk in gray. At days 3-6, both clones move to the ventral side and then form a joint sheath that moves laterally and back to the dorsal side enclosing the yolk.

 


View larger version (70K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Proliferation and migration of clones up to gastrulation. Pairs of opposing macromeres and micromeres were injected at the eight-cell stage and relative positions were scored at the soccerball stage and at gastrulation. (A-M) Embryos that have been double injected with TRITC dextran and FITC dextran. Pictures are triple exposures for brightfield and the two fluorescent channels for the injected dyes. Because the eggs have variable shapes and are photographed at slightly different orientations to maximize the visibility of the clones, the position of the anterior edge of the germ cells and center of the endoderm cell region are marked by an arrow and broken circle, respectively, in order to facilitate the comparison of the panels. Among the early eggs, the angle between the longitudinal axis and the AP axis is variable, but most frequently, the angle is ~45°. Note that there are two different arrangements of cells that show mirror symmetry as seen in G versus K. (A'-M') Schematic drawings. The drawings integrate the distribution of clones found in (A-M) and in other experiments. The data are projected onto an idealized embryo with a single aligned longitudinal egg axis and embryonic AP axis. Blue dots indicate approximate numbers of nuclei. (A-C) The `Mv'+`Ep' pair. (B) `Mv' proliferates slower than `Ep'. (C) `Mv' forms the deeper (internal) part of the rosette, while `Ep' covers the superficial dorsal posterior region of the egg. (D-F) The `El'+`Er' pair. (E) `El' and `Er' proliferate at the same rate. Note that this embryo is rotated so far that the endoderm cells are out of the field of view. (F) `El' and `Er' are situated to both sides (left and right) and ventral to the rosette. (G-J) The `g'+`en' pair. (G) The `g' clone forms a cluster of small cells that divides very little all the way up to hatching. (J) The `g' clone migrates and forms the superficial (outer) part of the rosette. The `en' cells become flat and spread out. (K-M) The `ml'+`mr' pair. (L) `ml' and `mr' cells divide very little until after gastrulation. (M) `ml' and `mr' cells are lined up adjacent to the ectoderm clones. Scale bar: 100 µm in A-H; 80 µm in I-K.

 


View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Fate map and mirror symmetry of the blastomeres. (A,B) Dorsal view at the eight-cell stage with the macromeres highlighted in A and the micromeres highlighted in B. (C,D) Schematic of an early germband stage embryo (ventral view), with the fates of the macromere progeny illustrated in C and the micromere fates illustrated in D. (C) `Mv' (green) produces the visceral mesoderm, `Er', `Ep' and `El' (dark blue, purple and light blue, respectively) produce the anterior right, posterior and anterior left ectoderm respectively. The progeny of these four macromeres are still located on the surface at the early germband stage; the `Mv' clone is internalized later. (D) `g' (yellow) produces the germ cells, `mr', `en' and `ml' (dark green, red and light green, respectively) contribute the right somatic mesoderm, the endoderm and the left somatic mesoderm, respectively. The cells of the four clones are already internalized (lying underneath the superficial layer of cells) by germband formation. [Germband in C,D is adapted from Weygoldt (Weygoldt, 1958Go).] Note that we show the eight-cell stage from the dorsal side as the micromeres would otherwise not be visible from a ventral view, and show the germband embryo from the ventral side, as this is the standard orientation for illustrating arthropod embryos. (E) First, second and third cleavage. The first cleavage (which gives rise to the two-cell stage) is transversal and slightly unequal, the second cleavage (which gives rise to the four-cell stage) is longitudinal and slightly unequal as well. Variation in the location of the furrow of the second cleavage is the cause of two different arrangements at the four-cell and eight-cell stages that show mirror symmetry. At the four-cell stage, sister pairs are indicated by common colors (red shading versus green shading). The third cleavage (which gives rise to the eight-cell stage) is latitudinal and highly unequal, and gives rise to the distinction between macromeres and micromeres. (F,G) Cell pedigrees of the two arrangements at the eight-cell stage. The sister cells `Mv' and `g' either share a progenitor with `Er' and `mr' or with `El' and `ml'. Note that in either arrangement, the relative location of germ layer progenitors is still the same.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Crustacean fate maps and various cell lineages. (A,C,E,G,I) Fate maps from crustacean taxa that possess total cleavage. The fate maps show the arrangements of the mesoderm, endoderm and germ cells at the time of the gastrulation. The fate map of Parhyale is derived from the lineage tracing data described here. All other fate maps were conceived from staining whole embryos and looking at the differential morphology and location of cells. By definition, the position of initial cell ingression is defined as the blastopore. The blastopore, however, is at different places in different crustaceans. The blastopore is anterior in Parhyale, posterior in barnacles, shrimps and copepods, and ventral in waterfleas. Therefore, the panels show ventral views, anterior upwards in A,I, and posterior views, dorsal upwards in C,E,G. Although Parhyale is a malacostracan crustacean like shrimps, its fate map (A) is less similar to that of shrimps (E) and more similar to those of non-malacostracans (C,G,I). In all four taxa, the endoderm progenitors (gray cells with blue nuclei) or joint endoderm+germline progenitors (gray cells with yellow nuclei) are situated in front of the mesoderm progenitors (green cells). Moreover, in Parhyale (A), Cyclops (G) and the waterfleas (I), the endoderm and mesoderm encircle the germ cells (white cells with blue nuclei). The fate map of the malacostracan shrimps (E) places the endoderm dorsal of the mesoderm. Most other malacostracans have superficial cleavage and the mesoderm is positioned anterior of the endoderm (not shown). (B,D,F,H,J) Crustacean cell lineages. Again, other than for the work reported here for Parhyale, cell fate in the crustacean cell lineages has been inferred from cell morphologies and is not based on tracing experiments. The number of divisions before the putative progenitors for mesoderm, endoderm and germ cells (m, en, g) are specified varies across the taxa from three in the amphipod, four in barnacles and five in the copepod, to seven in shrimps. The germline emerges as a sister of either the endoderm or the mesoderm but not the ectoderm (ec), but has not been recognized in early barnacle embryos. (K,L) Nematode and spiralian cell lineages. In C. elegans, the endoderm is specified after the third division. In Patella, the primary mesoderm is specified after the sixth division. Data are based on the following: (A,B) malacostracan amphipod Parhyale (this study); (C,D) maxillopodan barnacles (Bigelow, 1902Go; Shiino, 1957Go); (E,F) malacostracan shrimps (Kajishima, 1951; Hertzler, 2002Go); (G,H) maxillipodan copepod (Fuchs, 1914Go) (the relationship between the AP axis and the endoderm and germline that is shown here is modeled after other crustaceans); (I,J) branchiopodan waterfleas (Grobben, 1879Go; Kühn, 1913Go); (K) nematode C. elegans (Sulston et al., 1983); and (L) limpet snail Patella (Dictus and Damen, 1997Go).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002