spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Irish, V. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Irish, V. F.

Regulation of APETALA3 floral homeotic gene expression by meristem identity genes

Rebecca S. Lamb1, Theresa A. Hill1,*, Queenie K.-G. Tan1 and Vivian F. Irish1,2,{dagger}

1 Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology and
2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, P.O. Box 208104, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
* Present address: Section of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA



View larger version (7K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Constructs used in this study. The AP3 promoter, showing positions (in gray) of the distal early element (DEE) and proximal early element (PEE) which are required for early stage 3 to stage 5 expression of AP3 (Hill et al., 1998Go). Constructs used in this study are shown. The stippled area represents the putative TATA element and the arrow indicates position of ATG.

 


View larger version (158K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. LFY is required for expression from the AP3 promoter. GUS expression conferred by the 5D4::GUS promoter construct. This construct drives expression in a wild-type background in the presumptive petal and stamen primordia at stage 3 (A) and expression is maintained in this domain in later stages of floral development; expression at stage 8 is shown (B). This pattern of expression is largely abolished in a lfy-6 mutant background, with no detectable GUS expression at stage 3 (C). At stage 8, a limited patch of GUS expression is observed at the base of the developing second and third whorls (D).

 


View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. LFY binds to sequences within the distal early element of the AP3 promoter. (A) Electrophoretic mobility shift assay demonstrates that in vitro translated LFY gene product binds to a labeled sequence corresponding to the AP3 promoter region from –727 to –554 (test fragment) which contains the DEE (shown in gray). The ability of various cold competitors to block LFY binding is shown. Competitor 1 contains sequences from –727 to –554 and corresponds to the test fragment; competitor 2, –705 to –587; competitor 3, –662 to –554; competitor 4 –727 to –626; competitor 5, –618 to –554; and competitor 6, –727 to –678. The brome mosaic virus (BMV) in vitro translation reaction was used as a non-specific control. (B) The region to which LFY binds was further subdivided into site I (–678 to –659) and site II (–658 to –627). Palindromic sequences within each of these sites are underlined; these sites are aligned with LFY binding sites defined in the AP1 and AG floral homeotic gene regulatory regions (Busch et al., 1999Go; Parcy et al., 1998Go). Sequences mutated in AP3 site I and AP3 site II are shown in bold. (C) Yeast one-hybrid assays demonstrate that LFY binds to AP3 site I. Trimerized versions of AP3 site I, site II or the 52 bp fragment containing both sites (site I site II) were fused in a normal (+) or inverted (–) orientation to the lacZ reporter gene and introduced into yeast. Similar constructs were generated containing the mutated site Im or site IIm versions described in B. The ability of the GAL4 activation domain alone (GAD) or the GAL4 activation domain fused to LFY (LFYAD) to activate lacZ expression was assayed in five replicates. Standard errors for each construct are shown. (D) Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrate that LFY binds to site I. The ability of in vitro translated LFY protein to bind to labeled sequences corresponding to site I, site II, or the mutated versions was assessed. BMV, non-specific control.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Activation of AP3 expression by LFY in vivo. (A) Results from real time RT-PCR amplification of RNA isolated from 35S::LFY-GR; 35S::UFO seedlings mock treated with 0.1% ethanol and 0.015% Silwet (M), or treated with dexamethasone (D), cycloheximide (C), or dexamethasone and cycloheximide together (D/C). Amplifications were carried out with primers and probe corresponding to AP3, and normalized to the mock-treated control. Standard deviations are indicated. (B) Results from real time RT-PCR amplification of 35S::LFY-GR; 35S::UFO seedling RNA using primers and probe corresponding to AP1; treatments and labels as in A. (C) Results from real time RT- PCR amplification of seedling RNA from the indicated genotypes, using primers and probe corresponding to AP3. Standard deviations are indicated. (D) Results from real time RT-PCR amplification of 35S::LFY-GR; lfy-6/lfy-6 young floral tissue RNA using primers and probe corresponding to AP3; treatments and labels as in part (A). (E) Results from real time RT-PCR amplification of 35S::LFY-GR; lfy-6/lfy-6 young floral tissue RNA using primers corresponding to AP1; treatments and labels as in A. (F) Results from RT-PCR amplification of 35S::LFY-GR; ap1-1/ap1-1 young floral tissue RNA using primers and probe corresponding to AP3; treatments and labels as in A.

 


View larger version (109K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Mutation of the LFY binding site in the AP3 promoter does not disrupt expression in planta. The 5D3::GUS construct containing site Im and site IIm mutations (5D3-ImIIm::GUS) confers GUS expression in the presumptive petal and stamen primordia in a wild-type background both at stage 3 (A) and at stage 8 (B), similar to that seen for the unmutated version of 5D3::GUS (Hill et al., 1998Go). 5D3-ImIIm::GUS also confers GUS activity in 35S::LFY, 35S::UFO seedlings (C). Expression of the D3-18 construct containing site Im and site IIm mutations (D3-18-ImIIm) in a wild-type background at stage 6 (D) and stage 10 (E). This pattern of GUS expression recapitulates that conferred by the unmutated D3-18::GUS construct (Hill et al., 1998Go). Furthermore, D3-18-ImIIm::GUS is expressed in seedlings containing the 35S::LFY, 35S::UFO transgenes (F).

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Model for activation of AP3 expression. Initiation of AP3 expression in the flower depends on multiple regulatory cascades. LFY appears to act through at least three pathways; one pathway is direct, one pathway requires the function of AP1; another indirect pathway depends on an as yet unidentified factor (X). In addition, a LFY-independent mechanism requiring unknown factor(s) (Y) functions in certain tissues to promote AP3 transcription.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002