spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Movies
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grose, R.
Right arrow Articles by Werner, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grose, R.
Right arrow Articles by Werner, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A crucial role of ß1 integrins for keratinocyte migration in vitro and during cutaneous wound repair

Richard Grose1,*,{dagger}, Caroline Hutter2,{dagger}, Wilhelm Bloch3, Irmgard Thorey1, Fiona M. Watt2, Reinhard Fässler4,5, Cord Brakebusch4 and Sabine Werner1,{ddagger}

1 Institute of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, ETH-Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
2 Keratinocyte Laboratory, Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, London WC2A 3PX, UK
3 Institute of Anatomy, University of Cologne, D-50931 Köln, Germany
4 Department of Experimental Pathology, Lund University, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden
5 Max-Planck-Institute of Biochemistry, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany
* Present address: Viral Carcinogenesis Laboratory, Cancer Research UK, London Research Institute, London WC2A 3PX, UK
{dagger} The first two authors have equally contributed to this work



View larger version (93K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Postnatal development of K5ß1-null mice. Ten d.p.p. K5ß1-null mice have a thinner coat (A), but there is no significant difference in their size or weight (A,B). Transverse sections through the back skin of control (C) and K5ß1-null mice (D) at day 10 p.p. reveal a decreased number of hair follicles in K5ß1-null mice, with concomitant recruitment of macrophages (stained in brown using anti-F4/80 antibody) to the dying follicles (asterisks in D). F, fatty tissue; HF, hair follicle. Scale bars: 200 µm.

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of ß1 integrin deletion on adhesion of primary keratinocytes. (A-C) Surface expression of integrins in freshly isolated keratinocytes from 2-day-old K5ß1-null mice (ß1 {Delta}/{Delta}) and control littermates that were homozygous for the floxed ß1 integrin allele but did not express Cre recombinase (ß1 fl/fl), as determined by FACS analysis. Orange lines represent the second antibody control. Keratinocytes were stained with antibodies against ß1, ß4 and {alpha}v integrins. (D,E) Loss of focal adhesions and actin stress fibres in ß1-null keratinocytes. Wild-type (D) and ß1-deficient (E) keratinocytes were cultured for 2 days and examined for focal adhesions (green) and F-actin (red) by immunofluorescence staining with an antibody against paxillin or by staining with phalloidin, respectively. Note that the ß1-null cells are completely rounded and that the green fluorescence is cytoplasmic paxillin. (F) Adhesion of wild-type and ß1-deficient keratinocytes. Keratinocytes were plated onto 96-well plates (5x104 cells/well), pre-coated with fibronectin (FN), laminin (LN), poly-D-lysine (PDL), collagen type I (COLL 1) and collagen type IV (COLL 4). Adhesion was quantified using a CytoTox 96 colorimetric kit. Error bars represent standard deviation of the mean of triplicate samples within one experiment.

 


View larger version (75K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of ß1 integrin deletion on keratinocyte migration in vitro. (A) ß1 fl/fl keratinocytes were infected with an EGFPCre-expressing retrovirus and examined 5 days later. Flow cytometry demonstrates that the ß1 integrin subunit is missing in 50% of EGFP-positive keratinocytes. (B) The GFP positive keratinocytes fail to spread. (C) ß1 fl/fl keratinocytes transduced with chick ß1 integrin. Red, second antibody control; blue, chick ß1 integrin-positive cells. (D) Chick transduced keratinocytes remain spread after infection with the EGFPCre retrovirus. (E) Phase and photograph of ß1 fl/fl keratinocytes infected with EGFPCre at t=0 hours of the movie. In colour are the tracks of two EGFPCre infected (dark and light blue tracks) and uninfected (red and green tracks) keratinocytes. For detailed migration movies, see http://dev.biologists.org/supplemental/.

 


View larger version (151K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Impaired re-epithelialisation in K5ß1-null mice. Haematoxylin and Eosin staining of sections from 1-day wounds reveals similar histology between wounds of control (A) and K5ß1-null (B) mice (arrows indicate the epithelial margin). By 5 days post-wounding, 60% of wounds to control mice had re-epithelialised, with the hyperproliferative epithelium clearly covering the wound bed (C), whereas those of their K5ß1-null littermates (D) had never closed, with the hyperproliferative epithelium remaining almost static at the wound margins (n=10 for each). The tissue covering the wound bed in D is eschar, which will eventually be shed when the epithelial fronts meet several days later. D, dermis; E, epidermis; Es, eschar; F, fatty tissue; G, granulation tissue; HE, hyperproliferative epithelium; HF, hair follicle; M, muscle. Scale bars: 200 µm.

 


View larger version (134K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Cell proliferation in 5-day wounds. Mice were injected with BrdU 2 hours before sacrifice. Sections of 1-day (A,B) and 5-day (C,D) wounds from control mice (A,C) and K5ß1-null mice (B,D) were stained with an anti-BrdU antibody (stained nuclei are indicated by arrowheads and the epithelial wound edge by arrows in A,B). There was an obvious impairment of keratinocyte proliferation in the hair follicles of K5ß1-null mice (A-D; compare asterisks in A and B). G, granulation tissue; HE, hyperproliferative epithelium. Scale bars: 200 µm.

 


View larger version (106K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions during wound repair. Immunostaining on sections from the middle of 10-day wounds, with an anti-ß1 integrin antibody reveals expression in basal keratinocytes of the healed epidermis of control mice and confirms the absence of ß1 in the epidermis of K5ß1-null mice (arrows in A,B). Lack of ß1 integrins also results in a disturbance in hemidesmosome localisation, as detected by immunostaining on sections from 5-day wounds for ß4 integrin (red; arrows in C,D). The hyperproliferative epithelium is stained with an anti-keratin 6 antibody (green). G, granulation tissue; HE, hyperproliferative epithelium. This difference in hemidesmosome staining is recapitulated in the staining for the laminin 5 substrate (magenta) to which they bind (arrows in E,F). By contrast, expression of E-cadherin (magenta) is similar in the hyperproliferative epithelium of 5-day wounds of control and K5ß1-null mice (G,H). G, granulation tissue; HE, hyperproliferative epithelium. Scale bars: 50 µm.

 


View larger version (128K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Structural analysis of the epithelial tongue. Light microscopical (A-D) and ultrastructural (E-H) views of the epidermal tongue at the margin of 5-day wounds as it cuts a path between the granulation tissue and the overlying eschar. The migrating keratinocytes of the hyperproliferative epithelium in control mice are relatively loosely associated with each other, showing extensive intercellular spacing (compare asterisk in E with that in F). By contrast, wound margin keratinocytes of K5ß1-null mice are densely packed (compare A,C,E with B,D,F). The boxes represent the approximate areas shown in the higher magnification figures. The number of tonofilaments attached to the desmosomes was significantly reduced in K5ß1-null mice (H) compared with controls (G) (indicated by arrows). Es, eschar; G, granulation tissue; HE, hyperproliferative epithelium; N, nucleus. Scale bars: 50 µm in A,B; 20 µm in C,D; 1 µm in E-H.

 


View larger version (89K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Histology of 15-day wounds reveals marked differences in the outcome of the repair process. Masson trichrome staining of 15-day wounds of control mice reveals complete re-epithelialisation (A). However, in several wounds of K5ß1-null mice, the epithelial tongues fail to fuse and detach from the underlying granulation tissue (B) and, where fusion does occur, the epidermis is far thicker than that seen in control mice (compare A with C). G, granulation tissue; HE, hyperproliferative epithelium. Scale bars: 200 µm.

 


View larger version (140K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Repair of incisional wounds is delayed K5ß1-null mice. Haematoxylin and Eosin staining reveals that full-thickness incisional wounds on the backs of 10 d.p.p. control mice had healed by day 3 post-injury (A; arrows indicate where the panniculus carnosus has been cut), but wounds of K5ß1-null mice are wide open at the same stage (B). By 6 days after wounding, wounds of both control and K5ß1-null mice have healed (C,D). Es, eschar; F, fatty tissue; G, granulation tissue; HE, hyperproliferative epithelium; HF, hair follicle; M, muscle. Scale bars: 200 µm in A-D.

 


View larger version (142K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Increased inflammation but normal angiogenesis in the wounds of K5ß1-null mice. F4/80 staining for monocytes/macrophages (brown stain indicated by arrows in A and B) at day 2 post-wounding showed no difference. In 5-day wounds (C-F) there was a clear increase in neutrophil presence (as detected by staining for Ly-6G – brown stain indicated by arrows in C,D) in the wounds of K5ß1-null mice (D) compared with control littermates (C). No difference was observed in angiogenesis as detected by staining for PECAM1 – magenta stain indicated by arrows in E,F). Es, eschar; F, fatty tissue; G, granulation tissue; HE, hyperproliferative epithelium; HF, hair follicle. Scale bars: 200 µm in A-D; 40 µm in E,F.

 


View larger version (95K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. Gene expression during the repair process. Expression levels of genes encoding key players during wound healing were determined by RNase protection assay on 20 µg RNA samples from non-wounded back skin from 10 and 20 d.p.p. mice plus 1, 5 and 10 day wounds from control and K5ß1-null mice. 1000 cpm of the hybridisation probes were loaded in the lanes labelled ‘probe’ and used as size markers. tRNA (20 µg) was used as a negative control. RNA (1 µg of each) was loaded on a 1% agarose gel and stained with Ethidium Bromide to control for sample integrity and concentration (bottom panel). The intensity of the signals as determined by phosphorimaging is shown schematically on the right-hand side. All protection assays were repeated with a separate pool of RNA samples from an independent skin/wound series.

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12. Model for re-epithelialisation of incisional wounds by normal and ß1-null keratinocytes. In skin of control mice, ß1 integrins are localised to the basolateral surfaces of basal keratinocytes. After wounding, control keratinocytes use ß1 integrins to bind to the newly exposed dermal ligands. Thus, re-epithelialisation occurs rapidly and results in a downward migration of the epidermis. In K5ß1-null mice, keratinocytes are unable to recognise dermal ligands after wounding and remain static at the wound margin, although they still proliferate. Their cell-cell contacts are also tighter than those of control keratinocytes. Once the wound is filled with granulation tissue, which contains matrix molecules recognised by non-ß1 integrins, K5ß1-null keratinocytes are able to migrate across the surface of the wound to complete re-epithelialisation, but they do not show the V-shaped repair morphology characteristic of control wounds.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002